I am getting divorced and have a 19 month old daughter, my husband is an alchoholic and drug addict and has many destructive behaviors including skanky, bimbo's as girlfriends they are part and parcel of his addictions.He is also a pathological liar. I will have sole custody and do not want her exposed to this kind of behavior. The court will probably direct me to give him reasonable visatation . I want to make sure my daughter is not exposed to these things. So far he has not shown up to see her on weekend visits under the influance, but during the week he is out drinking and doing all sorts of crap with these people and expects to show up and play "family" when he comes to see her. He lies about everything and I catch him constantly.He has been informed that he is no longer welcomed in my home or allowed to see the baby untill he gets his act together because I do not want her to think theses things are acceptable behavior. Can I put something in my divorce papers that states this?
2006-07-26
15:39:29
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Tisch
1
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Marriage & Divorce
Thanks for the answers so far, I know that I will have sole custody because he has already agreed to it. I had to take him to court to get a temporary child support order. I have been documenting stuff for years as a result of his addictions and in reality could have him thrown in jail for some of the things he has done. I am not a vindictive ***** as he seems to think since I stopped allowing him to see the baby, but this has nothing to do with him and I , its about protecting her and trying to ensure that she has as "normal" of a life as possible considering the circumstances. I have been more than fair and extended myself in the hope that we could make the best out of an awful situation for her sake I know about the option of supervised visits, and will do it if all else fails, And in spite of it all I know he loves her and she loves him. I want them to have a relationship. But if he is doing the crap he is doing he can't be in her life . I guess thats where the clause comes in
2006-07-26
16:35:56 ·
update #1