Hey Liberals, if Bush is doing such a bad job with terrorism what do you say about Clinton when he let Osama?

Question

go free? Look where that got us!!

For you Liberals who say to get out of the past, if wasn't for the past we wouldn't have had the unfornunate incidents of 9/11, and for the person who posted about Lewinski, if Clinton wasn't so busy getting bj's in the White House maybe he could have done something about Osama

Answer 1

WHY DO WE HAVE TO BEAT A DEAD HORSE? CAN'T GO BACK TO THE PAST SO THERE SHOULD BE REASON TO BRING IT UP NOW....

Answer 2

Clinton doesn't have a thing to do with how crappy a job Bush is doing.

As far as "the war on terror", by most accounts, Bush should have been aware of the 9/11 threat long before it happened. He slacked off and ignored recommendations from American intelligence. Had he been on the ball, 9/11 could have been prevented.

Don't forget, Bush has maintained an ingrained business relationship with Osama's family for years prior to 9/11. I'm not a conspiracy buff saying he covered up the attack. I am saying he had a personal interest in covering his own butt after it happened.


By the way, I didn't like Clinton much either and I'm not a Democrat or a liberal.

-For "Johnny" above: prior to 9/11 American intelligence was well aware of the threat without the use of open wiretaps on Americans. Your accusation of hypocrisy is baseless. Dog eat your homework?

YOUR'RE KIDDING.........right.? The reason our country was attacked on 9/11 revolves around old Billy getting his schlong schlocked in the oval office??? If you're not (kidding), you're obviously developmentally disabled, in which case I feel terrible for knocking down your asinine commentary.

Maybe you should try out for the Special Olympics debate team?

Good luck. You'll need it.

Answer 3

Bush has no longer done an striking pastime. He abandoned Afghanistan at a time after we had a risk of defeating Al Queda and the Taliban to attack Iraq, a purpose he had nursed all alongside the way, shown with suggestions from the airfields prevalent alongside Iraq's perimeters and different strikes. The purpose develop into oil and, regrettably, the ferocity of the warlords made the proposed pipeline by Afghanistan from the oil-wealthy Russian province an impossibility. Bush paid Pakistan a thousand million a 12 months to administration terrorism in an area the position the administration did not exist. apart from some 0.5-hearted tries, this money develop into wasted and Al Queda and the Taliban grew to larger strengths, at the same time as taunting video clips were despatched out to the Western international. The pitiful inactiveness at Bora Bora, on retrospect, appears like a planned attempt to enable bin encumbered to flee. without Osama, the Al Queda grew to develop into rudderless, the phobia of terrorism in the USA lessened, and the plans to flow ahead in the middle East weakened. everyone believing Bush has done a sturdy pastime on any the front, be it relations or overseas, must have fallen asleep on the wheel.

Answer 4

If the republican machine would have stayed out of Clintons personal life, he could have dealt with Osama. Instead he had to spend the last two years of his presidency ducking republican terroristic lynch mob.

The republicans are the ones that took the spotlight off Osama and put it on Lewinski.

Bush is doing as good with the war on terror as Clinton did with the war on drugs. The street price of extacy is now lower than marijuana. Great job Clinton. What is the deal when Presidents declare war on nouns instead of nations?

Answer 5

Osama bin Ladin was an ally of the USA when Clinton was president. Specifically he was good friends with George Bush senior. That's the kind of question that gives conservatives a reputation for being stoopid.

Answer 6

Moving forward six years. . .

Clinton is gone. Do you think that when he got into office he didn't have to clean up after GW's daddy??? Everyone makes mistakes. Republicans just like to think that their only mistake is that they don't make any mistakes.

Let's see, what can I question you about that Georgie has/hasn't done. Maybe that $3 plus I'm paying at the pump. . . Or the Medicare fiasco. . . Or what about that budget. . . And how 'bout that war we're in? We winning that one? Are those insurgents surrendering yet? I could go on, but why? You'll only send me some angry e-mail that I can't respond to (juvenile) or call me some nasty names (also juvenile).

Just face it - everyone has their moments they're not proud of. Let them go and deal with what is going on right now! How we gonna fix THESE problems????

Answer 7

They cant say anything. They DO say the government is spying on us because they monitor LISTS of calls to known terrorist's areas of influence. Meanwhile MY social security and credit profile bounces all over from company to company and nobody cares. My school age kids get credit card offers because their State run school sells info on them

These same people complained because the government "should have known" about 911 prior, yet now when the Feds try to do something they are spying or violating their rights.

You cant win with Liberal mentality.

Answer 8

Osama was a United States ally for a long time, up until the mid to late 1990's. We funded him. We supplied him. We trained him. Even after we cut off our connections with him, there was no reason for us to chase after him and get him. So we didn't and it literally blew up in our faces. So its not the liberals fault and its not the presidents fault. It is really no ones fault because it was an unanticipated situation

Answer 9

... um... Bush is letting Osama go free now?

it's like complaining about Clinton's China policies while Bush is doing the same thing?

do you guys even know what Bush is doing?

Answer 10

I love George Bush! I Respect Him Completely!

Answer 11

Clinton turned his back more times than just one....

As for Bush, I support him, and am proud of the job he is doing as our President.