2006-07-26 15:35:15 · 13 answers · asked by gregcincy2000 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wow, what kind of douche bag question do you call this?
2006-07-26 15:40:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
seems to be a lot of ignorance on this question - didnt you hear? - the architect designed the buildings to withstand multiple ariplane crashes
the heat from plane fuel is not half enough to melt steel
the buildings fell by gravity fall, not even pancake effect - pancake effect would have taken longer to fall
many people described explosions - people saw the demolition explosions
the firemen in the building reported the fires nearly out
the shape of the clouds of smoke and dust were pyroclastic, ie requiring explosions
silverstein wanted the buildings down - he dropped the third building on the day - it takes weeks to set up a building for demolition
the bush gang wanted a reichstag excuse to go into iraq for the oil boys, and to remove the constitutional protections for protesters against the forthcoming nazi government of america
god, watch the online documentaries, people
there is no doubt, no question - it is certain
2006-07-26 22:58:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here we go......I posted a question about Flight 77 flying into the Pentagon and got ZERO response from people that could explain their reason for believing ANYTHING other than a plane hit the Pentagon. Be prepared....someone will eventually, if they haven't already by the time I submit this, tell you to look at Loose Change. Do that......then watch the rebuttal (It's called Screw Loose Change) Then PLEASE someone explain to me IF the PLANES didn't hit the Pentagon or the Twin Towers.......then WHERE ARE ALL THE PASSENGERS??????????
2006-07-26 15:41:38 · answer #3 · answered by guatemama 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, an alligator got stuck in the air ducts. Then, it fell, hitting the floor, sending a shockwave throughout the entire tower, causing it to fall. Then, the shock from that collapse sent the other to the ground.
2006-07-26 15:38:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was a combination of a few things. The airplanes were definitely the principal reason. There were also structural flaws in the steel frameworks of the towers that were there since they were built.
2006-07-26 16:00:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Per the official report...it was not the direct impact of the plane rather the insuing fire the caused the collapse. The impact did cause the coating on the metal structure that retards fire to be displaced. However, the extreme heat from the burning fuel caused the metal to soften and subsequently collapse.
2006-07-26 15:40:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually it was not da planes! It was the 3200 fat a55es working that morning, apparently they were all doing jumping with joy, when they heard the Chimp could actully read a book like "my pet goat". ;-)
2006-07-26 15:48:38 · answer #7 · answered by Fed up in Texas 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lol,..yea Stef he's serious, some fools belive Bush planted bombs in it , like he did to the levies in New Orleans lol
2006-07-26 15:39:13 · answer #8 · answered by itsallover 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They say they actually fell due to the stell weakening due to the heat and strain
2006-07-26 15:39:12 · answer #9 · answered by rockydriver22 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Depends on who you believe.. Some think their were bombs in the building, while others believe the planes did it all.
2006-07-26 15:40:48 · answer #10 · answered by akosmacek 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋