THEY BOTH MAKE ME WANT TO PUKE.
2006-07-26 14:54:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Logical Democrat 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Where did you get the sources of these "statements"? They may have been edited by Michael Moore - he's pretty good with an editing blade to cut things to fit his views! I listen to Hannity all the time, and I've never heard him say anything like that. And I understand what Ann Coulter was saying - many (not all) Liberals are full of venom for this country and what it stands for - why else would they be trying to put activist judges in power - it's so they can manipulate the Constitution to be something it was never intended to be.
2006-07-26 15:02:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. Boof 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I heard him ask that question when asking what should be allowed.
He asked the man defending the people protesting at soldiers funerals, how much free speech is allowed. He asked, should they be allowed to walk up to their face and say, "thank God your son is dead!"? It was an example of why there should be a buffer zone for protesting at funerals. Keep the protester X feet away from the funeral.
I guess you liberals can't pay attention to what someone is talking about, so you twist it around.
By the way, are you sure that one of those sick protesters did not say that? Or are you just assuming they didn't? How do you know they didn't say that?
----
as for Ann's statement. I can only guess that her statement was basically saying that liberals hate America differently than the way terrorists do. I would have to have heard it. I'm sure you have it wrong though judging from your track record above.
2006-07-26 15:00:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didn't hear either of them say either thing. I don't know who Hannity was referring to, so I can't even discuss or defend it.
As for Ann Coulter, I think she has a point. She isn't saying that Islamic terrorists don't hate America, just that they hate America in a different way than liberals. And I think she is referring to those so far left that they would prefer US failure in Iraq just to make Bush look bad...and favor policies so pc that they would allow terrorists back into the country.
But what you have to remember is that both are out for ratings....just like every other tv personality. People like them purposely say things to get publicity. I can think of a few on the left....Michael Moore, Maureen Dowd, every college prof I ever had....
2006-07-26 14:57:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by loubean 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the position did you get the substances of those "statements"? they could were edited by Michael Moore - he's pretty solid with an enhancing blade to reduce issues to in good structure his perspectives! I pay interest to Hannity each and every of the time, and that i have never heard him say something like that. and that i understand what Ann Coulter replaced into affirming - many (no longer all) Liberals are finished of venom for this us of a and what it stands for - why else ought to they be attempting to placed activist judges in skill - that is so as that it will manage the structure to be something it replaced into under no circumstances meant to be.
2016-10-15 06:12:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because most Republicans will believe anything, if Bush told them that reading books and college educations contributed to terrorism, Republicans all over the country would be burning colleges and libraries everywhere. They are just gullible when someone who is a Republican tells them something. I am a Democrat but I damn sure don't believe all the crap the Democrats come up with. For Republicans, they come from a fantasy land where all Republicans are truthful, so what do you expect.
2006-07-26 14:59:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by JoeThatUKnow 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you sure Hannity wasn't just quoting a liberal? That would make a lot more sense.
And if you haven't realized by now, Ann Coulter is using satire
2006-07-26 17:40:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Austin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes,
they widen the divide.
they lie and distort all the time.
i have some to little faith in the republicans.
there are a lot of them who don't know they are
constantly lied too.
We, us, the left love this country, and see when it is going in a bad direction and change it.
the other side can name call all it wants.....it doesn't change the fact that we must always speak up and do the right thing.
the right wing is loyal to party above country.
it doesn't work that way for me..
I think that if they were to look for the truth outside of thier talking points and propaganda echo chamber that they
would realize they
have been lied too and not stand for it again.
Right wing fantics stood at mathew shepards funeral and held a sign saying "god hates fags"
2006-07-26 14:56:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by nefariousx 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do liberals deny what they said even after you play the tape? They accuse conservatives of saying things al the time. They never have the tape because they are inventing the 'quotes'.
2006-07-26 15:35:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What they do is look at the very extreme left that is like 0.001% of anybody that calls themselves liberal and then they generalize that to all liberals.
Yeah, it is a problem.
2006-07-26 14:58:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by beren 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They didn't make em up. The liberals did that stuff. I saw it on FOX.
Hehehe you liberals, so funny.
PS. I did make up the part about watching FOX. I don't watch TV at all.
2006-07-26 14:55:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by InnerCircle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋