I do too.
2006-07-26 13:38:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
8⤊
2⤋
not me.
I'll say it again, here is some food for thought:
if Hillary is elected, it will be at least 24 years of rule in the US by two families. Bush Sr. '88-'92, Clinton '92-00, Bush Jr. '00-08, and if it's Hillary, it would be '08-12, or '16.
There are many reasons I don't want Hillary as Pres...but I think this is a major one...we need some diversity.
2006-07-26 20:41:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by loubean 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not. I would never want someone that had anything to do with Bill Clinton in the white house again. I don't think the United States will vote a female into the presidency anytime soon, if ever. Nothing against females it's just how it is.
2006-07-26 20:40:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by chaser_downer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bill Clinton
2006-07-26 20:41:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What exactly do you know about H. Clinton or are just voting for her because it's vogue?
First first lady to come under criminal investigation
In May 1993, the co-president was accused of having a central hand in firing several long-time employees of the White House Travel Office, the better to give the pricey travel business to her Hollywood pals, Linda Bloodworth Thomason and Harry Thomason.
In 1996, Hillary was accused by the Senate Special Whitewater Committee of ordering the removal of potentially damaging files related to Whitewater
In June 1996, White House security head Craig Livingstone, a political operative and former bouncer, illegally obtained over 700 FBI files of mostly White House personnel from former Republican administrations. Hillary was accused of requesting the files and, in fact, hiring Mr. Livingstone,
Hillary gave false testimony about her co-defendant Ira Magaziner, who helped her conduct secret meetings about her failed plan to socialize U.S. medicine.
In 1999, after the wife of terrorist Yasir Arafat told the co-president that Israel was deliberately poisoning Palestinians, Hillary saw fit to embrace her
Selective Amnesia: In her 2004 book, "Living History," Hillary strangely omitted mention of her own and her husband's key associates, men with whom she took numerous photographs and who donated millions of dollars to her husband's campaigns, going back to their Arkansas days. These include – among dozens of other shady characters and outright criminals – Moctar Riady, the Indonesian billionaire owner of the Lippo banking company (the partner of which is the Chinese communist government and reputedly a front for Chinese espionage), and his son James, who eventually pleaded guilty to campaign violations.
Another example of her counterfeit hawkishness was demonstrated when she denounced the recent election of the terrorist group Hamas in Palestinian parliamentary elections, which led terrorism expert Steven Emerson to remind the public that, while co-president, Hillary met repeatedly with "groups that had openly supported Hamas, Hezbollah and other foreign terrorist organizations,” including, among many others, the militant Islamic Relief Association and The American Muslim Council, whose followers carried out the 1993 World Trade Center bombings.”
But I am probally wasting my breath
2006-07-26 20:55:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Boredstiff 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally would not. However, I think Americans(cough. ..Democrats...cough..) would vote for her just because she is a woman!~ Need I remind you that she moved to New York the last day possible to file for the Senator postion? She then was voted by the state of New York and had been a resident for what 30 days? I'm sure she knew what New York needed..
2006-07-26 20:40:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by KTMai 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
How interesting that would be... if she became the first female president...however the U.S, isn't gonna be hasty in choosing the next president after what we've seen with Bush...
2006-07-26 20:56:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by keybaordz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
My dog has been waiting for Hillary to campaign in our town. He would love to urinate on her stocking. A Presidentail run would be perfect. He likes queer women who have that bull style.
BOSCO
2006-07-26 23:57:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd rather have Barack Obama, however Sen. Clinton would be better than most.
2006-07-26 20:42:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by stezus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone with there head up there a$$ would want her as president. Because she's a women with power. I wouldn't vote for her if my life depended on it.
2006-07-26 20:48:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Martincic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Osama bin Laden, Fidel Castro, Kim Jung "mentally" Il, anyone who wants the government to run their life.
2006-07-26 22:31:16
·
answer #11
·
answered by glen_loves_fun 4
·
0⤊
0⤋