2006-07-26 12:57:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Ummmm why?????
2006-07-26 13:12:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first part wasn't that good for there to even be a second part. I like Jaime Foxx, but that movie was a bad career move. He is an oscar winner but he took third billing behind Josh Lucas and Jessica Biel? Give me a break.
2006-07-26 21:43:41 · answer #2 · answered by Truly_Complexed 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
According to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382992/news
"Stealth, a $130-million production starring Jamie Foxx, earned only $31.7 million domestically. "
They will have to make probably more than 170 million dollars overseas and in DVD sales to even consider making a sequel.
sorry, but it looks unlikely
2006-07-26 20:05:52 · answer #3 · answered by nickipettis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope not, the first one was painful enough to watch. It had a terrible story line and the acting was well what can I say, it was bad.
P.S. I never really forgave Miss Beal for leaving Seventh Heaven
the way she did.
2006-07-26 20:04:51 · answer #4 · answered by Peach 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hopefully it will be a Stealthfull no!!
2006-07-26 20:43:54 · answer #5 · answered by C W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! it was a non entertaining film!
2006-07-26 20:20:06 · answer #6 · answered by maxpowers_84 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well it would be nice but would need a new ship.
2006-07-26 20:03:13 · answer #7 · answered by clomtancy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dear god I hope not!
2006-07-26 20:25:50 · answer #8 · answered by Cookie 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋