Why are Conservatives allowed to live?

Question

We'd be a lot better off without them. We'd get stem cell research, gay marriage, and help for the poor! We should make like our fathers, the English, and just dump them all in Australia.

Actually, I don't even feel this way. All people should be allowed to live and should have their rights, I just wanted to see how people would react.

By the way, my I.Q. is 125. I'm not a genius, but I'm not stupid either.

Answer 1

/sarcasm on
I personally would like to put them all on a boat and ship them to Cuba under a dictatorial structure that they want to force on everybody here.

Then after a few years when they have aren't getting everything they want and are begging to come back, I'd say we just nuke Cuba. LOL
/sarcasm off

Serious answer: I do think it takes both sides to have balance BUT if ALL OF US only learn one thing from the Bush administration it should be that it is never good to have one party control everything.

I think we have had our share of cowboy diplomacy enough to last a lifetime.

EDIT ADDED: to the guy below me... you have it backwards. When we are young, we are ignorant and easily guided(easily persuaded by false rightwing propaganda and prejudices). As we grow and learn to think for ourselves and begin to view the world as a whole, we become more liberal and caring. It's called education, maturing and realizing you aren't the only person with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit to happiness.

Leogirl, you have the audacity to bring up low IQs when you are not educated on facts... there is no such thing as families on welfare any longer. This was stopped when welfare was reformed put a maximum limit over your entire lifetime that you could receive welfare... it varies state to state anywhere from 3 to 5 years.

Answer 2

1) You have Stem Cell research. You even have the Federal Government paying for some EMBRYONIC stem cell research. Bush is the first President to allow that. The ONLY thing he won't allow is for the government to pay people to destroy embryos.

2) Gay marriage does not exist. It makes about as much sense as a square wheel.

3) Help the poor? Over the last 40 years we've spent $6,000,000,000,000.00 in the war on poverty. We got what we paid for: Generations of people who think only stupid people work, that the smart ones figure out how to get the government to hand them money for nothing.

I do want to thank you for posting this question. It demonstrates to all the extreme intolerance of the left. You obviously feel that the Bill of Rights should only apply to people who agree with you.

Answer 3

allowed to live that the kind of wacko liberal statements that keeps Conservatism alive!

Stem Cell OK that's an opinion that many disagree with but I will give you that

Gay Marriage well it hurts or helps no one so I don't really care

Help the poor now that's funny! You mean Welfare!!! Oh yea the Liberal creation that was so abused that it has had to be reformed to avoid more abuse! Right lets allow people to sit on their butts not work and get checks to buy drugs! Yep that will help our Country!

I sure Australia supports your view. BTW our Fathers (as you say) from England were more conservative than us so that blew that out of the water. Next time you post a question try to make for sense

Answer 4

LOL.....its amazing we let people with such low IQ's live. First off deary
we have stem cell research.....we have all the stem cells we want. You have have your Embryonic and your NON embryonic. What you don't have is government money for the Embryonic. Gay marriage, well.....call it something else like a civil union. Help for the poor. Are you kidding me? These programs are are killing the working class. When you have generations of family on welfare there is a problem. I think you should be dumped somewhere, but not Australia, they sure as hell don't want your cancers either.

Answer 5

Give 'em a break! Some are re-habable. Old Cons forced into conship at an early age will privately tell you in their later impotent years the details of their wretched social rituals, their bored to the bone existence & the rigid religiousity that almost drove them beyond bonkers.
For those lucky enough to find rehab the post rehab'd condition often hears the many pleads for understanding. Society needing to understand the roots of their anger, their instilled fears (lots and lots of scary stories) and the imposed peer ignorance forced upon them by roaming gangs of intelligence police that install Fox News into their enclaves. A sad and limited humanity, indeed.

Answer 6

I'm trying to get one to come out and play with me right now. But, he just won't get down off the porch.

All he's done so far is go woof, woof. I even told him there wasn't a chain holding him back. He still wouldn't get off the porch to play with the big dog.

I guess it's another wannabe chicken hawk. Oh, wait a minute, that's cutting down the noble bird chicken hawk, isn't it?

NeoCons, whadda' ya' gonna' do with 'em? I like your plan.

122 and I was having a bad day. I don't do math either. Pretty doggone good for a "hillbobby," huh.

brainlessbandit is fibbing, he's not brainless, he's clueless.

Hank Feral

Answer 7

If you eliminated all conservatives,you could get rid of the 2nd admendment, all the guns, legalize dope, make welfare the normal source of income, get socialized health care,have gay marriage, end wars, dismantle the military. Institute a socialist governing body.

If you eliminated all conservatives, where would you libs get all the funding for all your social programs, research, tax increases?
Who would work to pay into all of these re-distribution programs?

You wouldn't have anything.



And after that.....who would be your "loyal subjects"?

Answer 8

That is like asking why libs should be able to allow terrorists into this country, over tax the people, over spend the budgets, and allow criminals to run free.

Maybe there truly is a reason why libs were taken out of power for so long.

Answer 9

our brain gets more constricted by "values" and "cliche" of the society as we grow up. Some people can change that: start with the ammendment to the Law that requires you to be 35> Years old to become president.
We should have more young bright people representing us because we think differently than old people. In a rage I wish Old people belongs in clinic for heart diseases/alzheimer/cancer/diabetes life check.

Answer 10

Ongoing confirmation why Leftist governments have been responsible for more mass deaths than any other form of governments combined.

Mao's China - Up to 50 million
Stalin's Russia - Up to 20 million

Never mind Pol pot, North Korea or the "disappered" in South America.

Now you know why "conservatives" believe in private ownership of firearms. To defend ourselve against Leftists when they suddenly decide we shouldn't be allowed to live. Duh!