bush marketing and revenue analysts found it a good apprtunity to make extra money by stealing iraq oil .
so careless of the loss of american soldiers and american tax money, they showed the helpless saddam as a criminal holding chemical weapons.
as a result he attacked iraq without approval from the UN killing iraqi and american soldiers to gain access to the OIL.
go bush go america
2006-08-02 23:46:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by hicham a 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Point taken on the broken English. For the Iraqi people, we want peace FOR them. As far as why American soldiers are in Iraq, it is because Saddam ignored the U.N.'s demands for weapons of mass destruction (WMD's) that they had already visually verified in the past. He said that he had destroyed them, but refused to provide records, or any other proof, of this action. George Bush simply decided to enforce the U.N. mandate. (In the past two months, over 500 WMD's have been discovered in Iraq.) If you say that Iraqi people don't want Americans there, according to whom? The overwhelming sentiment from the people there is grateful.
Who told Saddam to invade Kuwait? How can the entire Arabic community be so uneducated about their own current events? How can an entire region of the world believe everything that their government and media put out? I guess that's why you are happy without "our" freedom. You don't know any better.
2006-07-26 19:42:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by dhills23 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Simple Machiavellian stratagizing by the Neo-Cons in the Project for a New American Century.
To put it bluntly - oil is the new standard for commerce and the American dollar is valued on it. The threat from China to gain access to the oil in the Middle East throws the American dollar and thus the economy in a tailspin, or that is the view of the Neo-Cons. Since Nixon took the U.S. off the Gold Standard, this has been a real problem.
Now why Iraq? Saddam was going to start trading his oil in Euros instead of dollars. And since the dollar was, and is even more so now, of lesser value than the Euro this caused a problem as the Neo-Cons saw it. Bush simply used the Bin Laden attacks letting them ferment into a way to access Iraq militarily and thus block China from that reserve of oil. The funny thing is that Iraq started selling its first steady supply of oil just last month. Guess who got that cheap, dollar-based petro? France! Ha! Bush F'ed us all then sells the cheap oil to France and him and his crony capitalists get richer and richer. Bush is a, or is puppeteer-ed by, genius(es)!
Now how I know? The initial illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq by the current Bush Administration was titled, get this: Operation Iraqi Liberation (O.I.L.) no kidding! It was promptly changed to Operation Iraqi Freedom... Why change it if there was nothing to hide?
2006-08-03 18:24:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by The One Line Review Guy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL......well dear, the PM of Iraq was just here and wants us to actually bring in more troops. It seems they are getting really tired of your crap. In answer to your question that would be Saddam. He invaded Kuwait, and he ignored every UN resolution, true he made a lot crooks rich, but he was also very cruel. So according to the terms of the gulf war we reserved the right to go back in if the rules weren't followed. So dear, it was Saddumb that paved the way for us.
2006-07-26 19:39:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
George W. Bush did, after listening to what he thought was God, but I doubt that God would have suggested. such an act. (Read Proverbs 6:17--19 in a Christian Bible) Not intending to be unkind here,but I suspect that GWB is a bit insane, or he tells untruths. I have considered many times, how I would feel if foreigners invaded the USA to free us from George W Bush. Your English is fine. One of my children is trying to learn both Arabic and Chinese. English is not easy to learn, as a "second language"
2006-07-27 08:01:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dorcas 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with chickenhouk, no one I know is in favor of invading Iraq. I dont think we have any business being there, trying to bring "democracy" to a civilization that is over 5000 years old. We ought to work on "democracy" at home. The real reason is over oil. Corporate America (who does nothing for me) is a bunch of whoremasters who would sell their grandmothers to the highest bidder for your oil. It's not the American people who are doing this, just our government.
2006-08-02 11:15:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who told Iraq to invade Kuwait?
2006-07-26 19:31:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joe P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, don't judge all American people by what our leaders do. Most Americans do not agree with anything going on in America and abroad. All we do is go vote for them and then it's mostly out of our hands. They convince us to vote for them on unhonest platforms and what they do next is anyone's guess. We do have a right to protest, but even that can get you locked up here. It is not fair that a lot of Americans assume that anyone from a Middle Eastern nation is a terrorist, but it is also not fair for people from other nations to assume all Americans hate other people from other nations. That is not true.
2006-08-03 15:34:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by SoulFly 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush, told the nation that the Iraqi's was part of the axes of evil and God told him to invade and so the dumbest of the repuglicans agreed.
2006-07-26 19:34:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to Bush, God told Bush to invade Iraq.
2006-07-26 19:31:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋