A recent poll shows that roughly 60% of Americans feel that our gov't either let 9/11 happen or were involved?

Question

For those of you that have not educated yourself about 9/11, I know you will answer my question with name calling and anger. The people who have looked into the topic will either agree that they believe it's an inside job or they will give their reasons why they do not agree with it being an inside job. So, please do not show your ignorance by name calling and being angry, it only shows you are unaware of certian topics of the 9/11 debate.

Loose Change 2nd Edition is a Google video and is a good place to start your 9/11 education.

Also, I would just like to point out to those who are going to name call and get angry that three buildings collapsed on 9/11. WTC 7 is at the heart of debate for what really happen on 9/11. I know you have never heard of this happening because it is not reported on mainstream media.

This is a link for WTC 7 just to give you an idea of what one of the major debates for 9/11.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=9184329400593634920&q=WTC+7

Another topic of contention is the fact that there were bombs in the Towers and this has gone unreported and unexamined.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building

Answer 1

This is a good time to be examining the collapse of the towers, because we are finally starting to get some cold hard evidence, that show us, how those buildings came down. Here is some of the most recent irrefutable evidence available today.

1. We now have eye witness accounts, from people inside of the building, telling of explosions taking place, on different floors, including lower floors, just before the buildings went down. Many of the witnesses, were silenced when the buildings collapsed, but their accounts live on, in just released radio recordings. (I'll try to find them on the Internet for you. I heard the firemens radio conversations, not to long ago.) They went something like this, "What's going on! I'm on the 22nd floor, and I just heard an explosion." "I'm on 72, and I heard one too."

2. Photographs of the buildings, just before it went down, show molten metal flowing out, from the building. Structural steel requires temperatures, well beyond burning jet fuel, to melt. Further, the color of the glowing molten metal, is also representative of high temperatures, beyond that of burning jet fuel. See source below, for detailed information, regarding structural steel melting points etc.

3. A chemical analysis of the molten metal, found at the site, shows traces of a chemical called, "Thermate". Thermate charges are used by professional demolition crews, to cut through steel beams, to demolish buildings. Incidentally, the samples were recovered by a member, of the clean up crew, who kept it as a souvenir memento. Most of the scrap metal, including the pools of molten steel, were recovered by a demolition crew, and discarded. There are though photos, at ground zero, showing beams that have been shearded at a right angle: Slag is shown dripping from the process. Click on photo, in website below; for a close up examination.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

4. Thermate traces have also been found, inside the bodies, of those exposed to the gases from the molten debris; people such as firemen and clean up crew members.

I found the following video clips, while conducting research. They do have a bias slant, but they are also very intriguing. Once you see them, you'll never be able to see the 9-ll tragedy the same again: I know I won't.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4258946892514662399&q

Answer 2

Each of the supposed flaws or inconsistencies in the official explanation of 9/11 is someplace where the conspirators, if they exist, failed to cover their tracks and left clues out in the open. Do you think the government was clever enough to pull off 9/11 and fool most people, but they left all those clues sitting around? Did they think no one would notice all those things? Come on.

Think about it: if the government wanted to do something like this, there are much easier ways. They have all the military hardware they want, why would they use airliners? A missile would be much easier to use and harder to trace. Or chemical weapons. Or any number of other things. Using airliners would just be stupid if you're the government, it complicates the plan enormously and risks exposure. But it makes perfect sense for terrorists.

Consider how hard the Bush administration tried to pin 9/11 on Saddam, and failed. If they had done the attacks, they would have done a much better job of framing Saddam. The 9/11 hijackers were mostly Saudis, and Saudi Arabia is the LAST country the Bush administration wants to look bad. If the government had done 9/11, you can be sure the Saudis would have appeared blameless.

Answer 3

This idea is not new at all. If you recall, when John Kennedy was assassinated, there were those who blamed the CIA. When Robert Kennedy was assassinated, there were those who claimed that it was the government trying to get more control over hand guns. There is always someone who puts out these conspiracy theories. It is obvious that there are those in the US who would love to see democracy die so that they could be in total control. Who they are depends on what you believe, I guess. Still, we know that they exist. It is possible, I suppose, but those of us who still have some small bit of faith that the actual principles of the US still have meaning don't really want to believe it. Of course, perhaps we are just hiding our heads in the sand, too. Instead of name calling, how about some serious consideration, and some research into the facts. If the American public had actually read the Warren Report concerning Kennedy in Dallas, there would probably be many more conspiracy theorists. Most the American public, though, are too fat, dumb and happy to really pay attention to anything but what the biased media tell them, and then they believe it completely. Sure saves them from thinking, doesn't it?

Answer 4

I neither can agree nor disagree. This has been an issue since it occurred. The timing of 9/11 appeared to be a perfect time for the economy and other problems that were putting America on a financial downfall. Although, it seems that our economy now is low war does bring profits. Think of how much it costs to build defense. This creates jobs. War also is a natural population control.
In your argument of bombs installed in the buildings, it does make sense. How can one plane collapse an entire building meant to withstand strong weather and earthquakes (in theory). I don't think you're wrong but I also don't think that the whole Government is involved. Only certain higher ups.

Answer 5

There are a number of unanswered question that fuel the controversy.

Sure people can sit down and attack Loose Change, but a better way to put an end to the "conpsiracy theory" would be to answer the ever growing list of questions? That is what the 9/11 commission was for, however they left America with even more questions.

True, you shouldnt believe everything you read on the internet, or see on television.

Answer 6

some people just have the hardest time believing that killers flew planes into the World Trade Centers despite multiple camera angles and burning plume of Jet Fuel. Which not only gutted the support structure, but melted the steel center support structure-because JP5 fuel burns at an astonishing 2,000 degrees! Wow, you guys just can't accept that militant muslims want us all dead. Try watching the video of Usama Bin Ladden taking credit for the terrorist act on 911 and listen to him laugh about it. Also don't forget he was also behind the 1993 WTC Bombing.

Answer 7

Loose Change is a documentary that has no basis in fact. You should read the Loose Change Manual, or something similar to that name, I can't remember the exact name of it, but it basically goes line by line through the P.O.S. movie and exposes it's ignorance and lies.

And did the U.S. know something MIGHT have happened someday before 9/11? Probably. But hindsight is 20/20.

Answer 8

Conspiracy theorists are just as capable as the government of concocting video "evidence" to support their theories. How do you account for the missing planes and their passengers? And the phone calls from flight 93 to loved ones and officials? I know our government is just as guilty as anyone else of propaganda. However, I don't believe they killed close to 3,000 people on 9/11.

Answer 9

I'm not angry nor do I name call. What you've posted amuses me. Now I know who will indulge in name calling and anger.

Answer 10

Polls are not necessarily representative of the truth.