2006-07-26 10:47:09 · 5 answers · asked by Douglas G 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Well, Humpty Dumpty was really a metaphor for a king...but keeping in the idea that he was an egg then no one could put him back together again so the baby chicken would never have a chance to hatch.
Even if HD was put together or didn't crack in the first place, there was no rooster to fertilize him or a hen to incubate him so I doubt that he would have hatched, rather he would have rotted...sad really.
2006-07-26 10:52:11 · answer #1 · answered by djotto00 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Humpty Dumpty was male he could not have an egg inside of him, he would be a rooster.
2006-07-26 10:50:21 · answer #2 · answered by EPnTX 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in the initiating if the eggs aren't any further fertile they gained't hatch. then you somewhat choose a chicken to sit down on them and if it is not any longer a sitting chicken, it really is wanting to sit down then it gained't stay with the eggs. Or an incubator to do the warming.
2016-11-26 01:30:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is the embryo of a dragon. No chicken here.
2006-07-26 10:51:22 · answer #4 · answered by yes_its_me 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
unhygienic york
2006-07-26 10:51:23 · answer #5 · answered by New User 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋