English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

blah, blah, blah... is that incoherent enough. Hope you are enjoying the label. It tells everyone, look at me, I expel the packaged ramblings of others and am incapable of having logical debates based on my own beliefs or knowledge base.

Hope that did the trick.

2006-07-26 10:22:52 · answer #1 · answered by kjbroom 2 · 1 2

Just being liberal won't attract an incoherent rant. First you need to spew forth as many lies about current events as you can. Just read some of the questions and answers posted from other liberals, that might give you an idea of the type of B.S. needed to illicit an incoherent rant.

2006-07-26 17:31:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
By 1973, John Kerry had already accused American soldiers of committing war crimes in Vietnam, thrown someone else's medals to the ground in an anti-war demonstration, and married his first heiress.Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it. Democrats couldn't care less if people in Indiana hate them. But if Europeans curl their lips, liberals can't look at themselves in the mirror.
Have we been cryptic? Right-wingers said Clinton was a lying, unscrupulous traveling salesman. It turned out he was a lying, unscrupulous traveling salesman. Now liberals scratch their heads demanding to know: So what was it about him you didn't like?
If John Kerry had a dollar for every time he bragged about serving in Vietnam - oh wait, he does.If we're so cruel to minorities, why do they keep coming here? Why aren't they sneaking across the Mexican border to make their way to the Taliban? Liberal soccer moms are precisely as likely to receive anthrax in the mail as to develop a capacity for linear thinking.Liberals are stalwart defenders of civil liberties - provided we're only talking about criminals. Liberals become indignant when you question their patriotism, but simultaneously work overtime to give terrorists a cushion for the next attack and laugh at dumb Americans who love their country and hate the enemy. My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building. Taxes are like abortion, and not just because both are grotesque procedures supported by Democrats. You're for them or against them. Taxes go up or down; government raises taxes or lowers them. But Democrats will not let the words "abortion" or "tax hikes" pass their lips. The New York Times editorial page is like a Ouija board that has only three answers, no matter what the question. The answers are: higher taxes, more restrictions on political speech and stricter gun control. Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening. We've finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism, and they don't want to fight it. They would, except it would put them on the same side as the United States. When we were at peace, Democrats wanted to raise taxes. Now there's a war, so Democrats want to raise taxes. When there was a surplus, Democrats wanted to raise taxes. Now that there is a mild recession, Democrats want to raise taxes. Whenever a liberal begins a statement with 'I don't know which is more frightening,' you know the answer is going to be pretty clear. Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant.
-Ann Coulter

2006-07-26 17:27:45 · answer #4 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 0 0

Ann Coulter for President, Che Leo for vice president

2006-07-26 17:39:06 · answer #5 · answered by o b 1 · 0 0

OMGoodness FSSsToo Supid ne1 sees?! PIE! IDIOCY! Liberal ... Fsstt0000pid! u R lam3!

/rant off

Well, I hope that was incoherant enough for you. Consider yourself somewhat flamed.

2006-07-26 17:23:18 · answer #6 · answered by Z33K Zmorphod 3 · 0 0

You realize that a man who speaks in the middle of a forest, where no woman can hear, is still wrong, don't you?

Well, that's the rant. Take it or leave it.

2006-07-26 17:21:48 · answer #7 · answered by Stuart 7 · 0 0

LOL I cannot believe that no one took you up on this, damn. That is no fun. Okay, here goes ....

Bush is the man, the man is Bush. He is our man. Our man is Bush. Our man is in Condi's Bush ... oops you are not supposed to know that. F U you are going to hell, I can do what I want cause I KNOW J E S U S and he says I am perfect. I am perfect in J E S U S. Don't tell me what the bible says, I listen to my Pastor. My pastor speaks for God. Bush speaks for God. I speak for God. I know God. GOP is God's Only Party. God and I make a majority, I will dictate to all you sinners. You are going to hell, I am going to make your life hell, so die now.

Okay, how was that? Feel good? Knew you would.

2006-07-26 17:28:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

LIberals enjoy life a WHOLE lot more than consevatives, out live them and are happier. Stay the course and do not give in to the leacherous, tear in my beer, holier than thou conservtives.

2006-07-26 17:23:51 · answer #9 · answered by Tony T 4 · 0 0

Global warming blah blah blah, war monger Nazi's blah blah, don't eat meat blah blah blah, gay marriage blah blah, Bush is a monkey blah blah, NeoCon blah blah, unfair give me hand outs blah blah blah, when Clinton was in office.

I think that about sums up an intellectual Liberal conversation.

2006-07-26 17:24:10 · answer #10 · answered by izombix 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers