2006-07-26 09:52:23 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=397428&in_page_id=1773&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=picbox&ct=5
Click on link if you have missed the latest fashion faux pas!!
2006-07-26 10:03:05 · update #1
I think it's the general combination of the lobster red skin and the (ever so slightly baggy?) white trunks that says, "Yuk." Perhaps he was trying to turn himself into the England flag as an apology?
2006-07-27 08:27:02 · answer #1 · answered by R.I.P. 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow, check out the TV.
those are real children being blown to pieces in Lebanon.
Who said women were shallow and vacuous.
2006-07-26 09:58:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
my eyes! my eyes! i'm blinded lol, i think its disgraceful the man is meant to be some sort of fashion icon, personally I can't stand him or his speedos
2006-07-26 14:21:41 · answer #3 · answered by Megan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought only the Germans wore Speedos now .... eeekkk!!
(sorry for stereotyping.. but the only people I know who wear them are German)
2006-07-26 09:58:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No one looks good in Speedos, I don't care who you are.
2006-07-26 09:55:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
on him yes on any body with out Davids body hell no
2006-07-26 09:56:23 · answer #6 · answered by poppy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not bad, but he doesn't fill them as well as freddie fills his calvins
2006-07-26 10:03:22 · answer #7 · answered by cross_sox 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
speedos dont look good on any man, golden balls or not!!!
2006-07-26 09:57:49 · answer #8 · answered by maria s 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Who damn well cares?
2006-07-26 09:56:49 · answer #9 · answered by wiz 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not even on Beckham thanks. Too little left to the imagination...not sexy at all.
2006-07-26 11:24:15 · answer #10 · answered by pomme_blanche_2004 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋