there are two kinds of globalisation. the economic one is just the continuation of an everlasting process in history, accelerated by modern technology. this in my opinion should be viewed as the good one, cause it follows our decisions as individual market participants in free societies and makes freedom attractive to those who are currently not free.
the other one is the political globalisation, the building of bigger and bigger supranational organizations which tends to undermine individual freedom. this is the bad one.
2006-07-26 08:57:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by libertarian 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
It is as beneficial as a case of hepatitis C. If you want to see your already decreasing rights and freedoms disappear altogether then globalization is the ticket. Any and all right wing governments anywhere will say world wide free trade is the only way to compete but the result will be the lowest paying jobs in the highest populated countries (China and India; Mexico and Brazil) and widespread unemployment in the West and G8. These governments will also amalgamated under the auspicious of the New World Order through the UN and have a single FORCE to protect their interests and developments in other countries (and that is any country with untapped or tappable natural resources). This will then cause tension with the countries that have the booming economies and populations which will require most of the worlds natural resources to fuel the out of control growth.
Globalization = Global Domination - WW III. The last one standing runs the show, what's left of it. Would you like to dance?
2006-07-26 09:39:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know, globalisation is an experiment in action, and it is too early to comment and what it will bring. OVerall all, some aprts of it have been godd and bad. It has resulted in mergers and creations ooof larger, more powerfull companies (some may view that as goood or bad) it is easier to work together, over long distances to finish projects or create new ideas (a good thing) outsourcing and closing of factories (probaly a better thing for the consumer) as well as cheaper goods (good for consumer), it has opened up the worlds intellectual market allowing for new ideas and companies to flourish. The flow of inforamtion has increased. Competition from otehr countries, for jobs ahs increased as well. Overall, it is merely that thye playing field is being leveled, and that is good, because it means that the best will get what tehy deserve in a fast paced, ever changing and tighter world.
Corporate expansion and the flow of culture is one of teh negative views of globalisation, but then again it is not bad either. IF those ideas and concepts did not work they would not have expanded welsewhere, like fast food or Wal-mart equivilants.Essentially it is what works will survive
2006-07-26 08:41:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes if you don't mind losing the rights that are protected by the constitution. If you read the UN charter it hands out rights (as if they had that ability) and at the end of their "Bill of rights" it states that these rights are only granted as long as they don't interfere with the UN's agenda.
2006-07-26 08:40:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO NO NO NO NO
Globalisation benefits the USA and NO ONE ELSE!
It is nearly as insidious and evil as every other piece of American Foreign policy.
2006-07-26 08:44:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Lone Gunman 6
·
0⤊
0⤋