Should there be a serious change in the UN?

Question

I use to think the US should leave the UN but is it possible the UN could be improved to actually HELP the world? I mean they have Suadi Arabia and Cuba on their human rights council!

ANyway to fix the UN? Or should US just leave?

Answer 1

I think the UN response to the attack on Israel by Lebanon is the last straw. They have become a significant source of evil in the world but are largerly powerless without our money. We should leave immediately and form a new world peace agency based on very strict standards. Only enlightened governments get a say in world events. The new body should be a military organization with the goal of systematically destroying threats to world peace via a strong policy of pre-emption. When rogue states like Iran start a nuclear buildup, they should be systematically invaded and their programs forcibly discontinued. They should then be put under a Marshall Plan like stewardship to put them on the right track to becoming a responsible members of the world community. Those countries that act toward the general good, get sweet deals with regard to aid, trade and economic development, while those with horrible human rights records get blocked.

The reason we should do this is quite simple. It is what is necessary to prevent a nuclear holocaust. Which brings up a big change that needs to take place in the free world.....dealing with treason and sedition. These serious crimes have lead to the current situation in the world and now are threatening all life on our planet. They can no longer be tolerated. Liberals and other marxist scum need to be rounded up and jailed for many of their behaviors. They are breaking the law and causing incredible harm in the process. No sane society puts up with that. All past societies instituted the death penalty for people like Ward Churchill, John Kerry and Michael Moore. We don't need to do that. But, we don't need to let them get away with it either.

Answer 2

The best way I can answer this question is to begin with the principle reason for the UN.

The United Nations was established in 1945 and in 1948 adopted the "Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide" as its primary purpose.

Since that time, the UN has failed to execute the CPPCG in the following locations:

Yugoslavia
Cambodia
Rwanda
Darfur
Iraq
Sudan
Uganda
Democractic Republic of Congo
Ethiopia
Somalia
Togo
Burundi
Liberia
Algeria
Sierra Leone
Mali
Madagascar
South Africa
Mozambique
Columbia
Venezula
Brazil
Argentina
Cuba
Chile
Paraguay
Mexico
North Korea
Afganistan
Sri Lanka
Burma
Indonesia
India
China
Phillipines
Chechnya


and many more...

With a failure rate of this magnitude, especially on the primary purpose, should we disban the UN?

Answer 3

I think the UN is pretty much doomed right now. Its shown its total incompetence, it doesn't even act on its own resolutions.

The best way to fix the UN is to let those who want to stay and do nothing but pretend to be doing good and use a useful orginziation of peoples who want to act rather than talk.

Answer 4

I think we should leave and form an international body limited to free societies and economies. Such an organization would have just as much right as the UN to engage in peacekeeping and enforcing situations, and would not have to put up with the posturings of dictatorships and neo-fascist thug states. Plus, France would not have a veto, and China couldn't belong.

Answer 5

I hereby grant my land in Floyd County, Virginia rather region for the convention and could assure that parking would be no issue if the delegates will all come on horse back and park their rides in my decrease container. we are able to have the convention interior the pristine hollow beside the creek the place the wild rhododendrons would be a stable backdrop for image opportunities. the only subject that i won't administration is the snow that would desire to fall right here in December, yet because of the fact the delegates all have faith in worldwide warming that would desire to be no issue for them. they are able to continuously forget approximately it like they do the medieval warming era so Al Gore's hockey stick graph will look as he needs. they might desire to all deliver their hockey sticks. it quite is going to be iciness interior the Blue Ridge Mountains, and probably i can propose something that would do with their sticks.

Answer 6

A change might be good.

Such as, perhaps relocating UN Headquarters to Gaza. That's where their #1 favorite terror organzations are headquartered.

UN Headquarters and Hamas Headquarters could even build a lovely garden connecting their buidings.

Answer 7

The UN should move to northern Israel so that they can catch a few in-coming from the friendly HezBULLie that they are so quick to support.

Answer 8

Disban the UN. What a waste of money and space.

Answer 9

yes, it should be changed, into nonexistance...
its a waste of money, time, effort...