English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

There are plenty of people who do more than her but receive far less publicity for their efforts.

2006-07-26 08:14:13 · answer #1 · answered by DannyK 6 · 0 1

Celebrities don't do anything without a reason. They also never show the pictures of the nanny's, housekeepers, and other professional people that pretty much raise the kids.

Angelina Jolie shouldnt' get the nobel prize.

2006-07-26 15:15:37 · answer #2 · answered by Ice4444 5 · 0 0

Not the nobel peace prize, but I do admire her...cause i couldn't adopt a child that has aids and may not get trough, I wish there were more ppl like her, that can share not just money, but love...

2006-07-26 15:16:30 · answer #3 · answered by curios 2 · 0 0

For what...sleeping with every co-star that she ever has whether they are male or female...single or married??? Home wrecking? Doing one lousy movie after another all for the worship of the almighty dollar? Swapping spit with your own brother in front of millions? I had no idea that would be in competition with someone who split the atom! Sure...she should get the Nobel PIECE of SH*T Prize!

2006-07-26 15:22:19 · answer #4 · answered by Tytania 4 · 0 0

In my opinion she is the dumbest b*tch thats famous right now. She adopts all these kids in third world countries and sh*t. But what about the kids here? I think she is one of the people that do things to make themselves "feel" better, not to actually make other people feel better or better their situation. Plus I heard she wants to adopt like 13 kids.... how much attention as a mother do you think she has to give to 13 kids and still work on location as an actress. Plus she's a whore.......

2006-07-26 15:16:47 · answer #5 · answered by Compulsory23 2 · 0 1

Yes, definitely!

She's taking what she has & she is doing good with it.

Photographers follow her around . So instead of complaining about them, she is using her celebrity to get people to see how much need there is to help others who have less. She knows that the world is watching so she is putting the focus on those in need instead of herself.

2006-07-26 15:13:41 · answer #6 · answered by ANGEL 7 · 0 0

yes. She donates 2/3 of her income to needy organizations and has to keep working to be able to support that

2006-07-26 15:15:17 · answer #7 · answered by emjay 5 · 0 0

She's been an example for young women everywhere. Style is more important than substance.

2006-07-26 15:23:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Adopting babies doesn't really help that much. Feeding the villages the babies come from so they don't have to be adopted would be better.

2006-07-26 15:14:56 · answer #9 · answered by Samuel B 3 · 0 0

She is an ugly bag that looks like a man .

2006-07-26 15:16:53 · answer #10 · answered by at home dad 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers