and get absolutley no recognition for it what would you choose?
2006-07-26 08:10:34 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Trivia
will some people please read the question properly before answering if you chose the cure then you can not gain any thing from it
2006-07-26 08:17:09 · update #1
Cure for cancer. My best friend died last year from it. I would do anything to have her back. No amount of money would compensate for losing her. Shows how materialistic we have become. Some people would prefer their own comfort at the expense of millions of others. I give £2 per month to Cancer Research and dream it's my £2 that will hit the cure.
2006-07-26 08:13:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I would choose the cure for cancer there are so many helpless people out there who die everyday from this horrible disease. I wish I could help them all. I couldn't choose the money as much as I would want to, in order to ravish myself in expensive things, wouldn't be right for the people who have made my life what it is. I have had friends die of cancer, and family and in about a year I will lose my mother to it. So finding a cure is where my heart would be, I wouldn't need any recognition just knowing I helped someone would be enough.
2006-07-26 08:28:38 · answer #2 · answered by Tigger7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm trying hard to imagine a situation where I discovered the cure for cancer and did not get any recognition or a s*** load of money. Therefore, I choose the cancer option.
2006-07-26 08:16:05 · answer #3 · answered by Lewiy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd pick the cure for cancer. However in all reality, if you found the cure for cancer, chances are wealth is just around the corner and with it much publicity. A reclusive billionaire, I like the sound of that.
2006-07-26 08:15:20 · answer #4 · answered by prinsin99 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would cure for cancer because even if I take the money, who knows someday I will get cancer and didnt enjoy anything. Life can seem like it gives you everything when it takes it all away later. Besides, I rather save the world from a deadly disease than bathe in billions of dollars. The money gives you stress from protecting it anyway.
2006-07-26 13:15:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if i or any1 in my family had terminal cancer i would have to say the cure. if not then as i wouldn,t gain wealth from it as u said probably the money as it could help to find the cure not only of cancer but other illnesses. but hen again if i was smart enough to cure canser even without recognition. then i,m sure i could cure something else that fortune would come with.
2006-07-26 08:30:23 · answer #6 · answered by herberto48 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely discover the cure for cancer without a shred of recognition.
2006-07-26 08:21:27 · answer #7 · answered by R.I.P. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
discover the cure for cancer
If I was a billionaire, I might become totally greedy and self absorbed and not even use my money to help others.
If more billionaires would donate money to cancer research, there would be a cure by now.
2006-07-26 08:14:01 · answer #8 · answered by Puff 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd cure the cancer, and live a long, happy wholesome life knowing that I improved the world in a very unselfish way. If I were to choose the money, I'd probably die of shame...or cancer!
2006-07-26 08:14:46 · answer #9 · answered by LEMME ANSWER THAT! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would be a billionaire and have an amazing lifestyle. My wife died of breast cancer 10 years ago, so if they found a cure for cancer tomorrow, it's too late for me.
2006-07-26 08:17:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋