Is it the plagiarism that bothers them or her being amoral?
2006-07-26 07:50:55 · 13 answers · asked by eddiervc 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hard to believe in this day and age, but there are still some things you just don't do.
She crossed a line when she made a vicious attack on people who lost loved ones when the World Trade Center went down, then compounded her error in defending her actions by going on the attack again.
While many people may like what she has to say, they risk being tainted by such malevolence if they appear to be supportive. Newspapers receive a lot of feedback from their readers, and the decision to drop her was no doubt a result of people writing in to request that they do so.
Ahhh, justice is sweet when it actually occurs, isn't it?
2006-07-26 09:00:56 · answer #1 · answered by functionary01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Ms. Coulter had suggested something approximately Tom Foley, who she violated balloting regulations to vote for, i could be in help of her unfastened speech. She for sure does not have a issue with gay pedophiles as long as they are Republicans. So i desire all of them drop her. and that i in my view do not understand why human beings can not comprehend that newspaper editors are basically workout recurring their unfastened speech whilst they do drop her. The antiCatholic bloggers on Edward's campaign team have been fired, weren't they?
2016-12-10 15:02:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. I'm sure they could give a sh*t about what an evil **** ann coulter is. I'm betting that she made circulation drop for those papers and that was the final straw
2006-07-26 07:55:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Or maybe most people who buy news papers are liberal and Ann Coulter is just a little too truthful for them.
2006-07-26 07:53:31 · answer #4 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coullter in such a tool. Shes got the intelligence but she just put a very pompous twist on things.
2006-07-26 07:53:10 · answer #5 · answered by peaco1000 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She came out a few weeks ago and basically said that all of the wives of 9/11 victims would rather be in the limelight rather then have their husbands back. That might have something to do with it, think ?
2006-07-26 07:54:49 · answer #6 · answered by jim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its probably a bunch of whinny crybaby liberals that preached the choir (press) and got her cut....I doubt she's missing much being left out of those papers.
2006-07-26 07:55:48 · answer #7 · answered by netjr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. None of that would bother American papers. Some idiot read the book, "Godless",and became real upset.
2006-07-26 07:54:15 · answer #8 · answered by Devil'sFoot37@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's full of hate. Pure and simple. Would you publish a column written by Hitler?
2006-07-26 07:53:20 · answer #9 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe they had her picture displayed by her column and it scared the readers.
2006-07-26 07:53:14 · answer #10 · answered by Lake Lover 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋