Here are just three very minor items that remain dubious...
Hillary's six-figure score trading cattle futures still demands an accounting. In less than a year, she saw a $1000 investment grow to nearly $100,000, a mammoth windfall considering she and her husband had a combined income of about $60,000.
Though she has dismissed it as an intellectual exercise, Hillary can expect to again be derided for what journalist Bob Woodward first reported as her frequent "seances" with Eleanor Roosevelt.
How about Hillary's advocacy on behalf of Black Panther Bobby Seale, then on trial in New Haven for murdering a suspected snitch. Might work real well when Giuliani is receiving the 2008 Presidential endorsement of some police fraternal organization.
While she probably should not be saddled with her husband's shameful record and legacy of sexual misconduct, from groping to rape, Hillary will have to answer for her own complicity in covering up those many sexploits!
2006-07-26 07:25:09 · 6 answers · asked by baltic072 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The responses are very heartening!
Perhaps the very best thing the Left-Wing-Liberal-ACLU supporting Democrats can do is nominating Hillary the "Lightening Rod" for President!
Can anyone begin to imagine the "Queen of Pander" who has yet to rponunce any policy statements i.e. on National Security and then debating a giant like Rudy Giuliani...on that issue alone that would be quite an event!
And her $3,000.00 Hair styling bills for just 2 months of clips and coloring paid to her "personal" Hairdresser from the Democratic Party War Chest not to mention paying this woman's expense money and other fees i.e.for Eye Lining
$1,800.00 is INSANE!
Yet she does it and it just fuels her Lesbian legacy rumors all the more !
2006-07-26 18:16:28 · update #1
Hillary not only has to answer for covering up her hubby's "sexploits" but she has to answer for staying with his sorry, cheating ***. Most women do NOT consider this to be the act of an "in charge" woman. I know I sure as hell lost what little respect I had for her when she chose to stand by her known philanderer of a man.
She has to answer for all of Bill's escapades in office including his pardon of known terrorists and drug dealers and his pardoning of those who "donated" to his personal library. She also has to answer for the robbery of White House furniture and her use of a "gift registry" for her exodus of the White House.
Then there is the fact that she recants her earlier extreme liberal views in an attempt to con the nation into thinking she is "moderate". Anyone who thinks of HRC as a "moderate" needs to have their head examined.
Pile on her failed national health care initiative, whitewater-gate, travel-gate, and all the personality failings and you have a complete and total loser of a candidate.
As far as I'm concerned, anyone who would endorse/vote for HRC for President is a complete nutcase worthy of institutionalization and/or a traitor worthy of the stiffest penalites associated with such a crime.
2006-07-26 07:31:56 · answer #1 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i'm hoping Hillary Clinton does grow to be President.. an extra effective effective element..invoice Clinton, became is an striking spokesman..And did nicely with overseas international places. in the present day we favor international kin .. or a minimum of a few advice from a former president, who knew a thanks to communicate and understand leaders from overseas international places! i'm effective he should be an excellent asset to Hillary!
2016-10-15 09:58:05 · answer #2 · answered by haberstroh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Hillary set back women's right many years by not showing Bill the door and making sure she locked it when she left.
As a woman, she endured public humiliation cause of him. My own mother thought it was fine, cause men will be men.
That is pure bull and Hillary helped perpetrate that crap.
SHe had no self-respect. I would never vote for her.
2006-07-26 07:31:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
She is untrustworthy. She is definitely a political player, but there is more game there than integrity of character from what I have seen. I think she wants power, and maybe nothing more, and I don't trust anyone like that.
2006-07-26 10:11:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not to mention shes a woman and noone will let a woman win in the US
2006-07-26 07:34:35 · answer #5 · answered by The King of All Answerer's 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think she is as big (if not bigger) of a liar as her husband.
2006-07-26 07:35:04 · answer #6 · answered by guatemama 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋