Why haven't we seen any glimpse of the baby?
2006-07-26 07:06:22 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Because the child she carried was in fact the reincarnation of L.Ron Hubbard and he is now in an incubator growing at a miraculous rate!! Next step. . . world domination!!!
2006-07-26 07:12:10 · answer #1 · answered by melbel 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It probably has a birth defect or something that they are not proud to show. It may have been born without a vital organ or something. For all we know, baby Suri could have died from a disease or something and Tom and Katie are just not ready to tell the world about it just yet. You would think that Tom would flaunt baby Suri since he does that to everything else he owns. Only time will tell if Suri really exists, or exists, but with a defect.
2006-07-26 07:11:04 · answer #2 · answered by Britney♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because she doesn't. The whole Tom/Katie thing has been a big P.R. thing that went horribly, horribly wrong. They paid Katie to pretend to be in love and wear a fake belly. She's an actress and can do that acting stuff. The CoS probably told her to do it or they would drop her in a well or something.
In other words, I'll believe that the baby is theirs when I see that child grin like a possum, just like Tom Cruise.
2006-07-26 07:11:48 · answer #3 · answered by drewsilla01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i exchange into examining an editorial that there are some extraordinary issues occurring with the beginning certificates. Like neither Tom Cruise nor Katie Holmes signed it. And it wasn't filed till 3 weeks after the beginning. Very extraordinary.
2016-11-03 01:24:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they don't want you to, and She is their child. Why the fecking hell does everyone think they have the right to pry and intrude wherever they like just because someone's a celebrity?
Suri is none of anyone's business. When they feel like showing her about, they will. Until then, find some other stupid thing to speculate on.
2006-07-26 07:58:57 · answer #5 · answered by LooneyDude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so.My guess is they are just trying to let the kid grow up as normal as possible. I mean, they are just people whose jobs throw them into the spotlight- the kid shouldn't have to sucumb to that.
On the other hand, they could be waiting to show the baby when Tom or Katie has a movie out to generate more publicity.
Either way, who knows? Who cares?
2006-07-26 07:12:35 · answer #6 · answered by fitgalmel1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey...exposure comes along with their jobs, including their sprites, especially if they want to keep their fans. I appreciate all the celebrities who have been willing to share their bundles of joys with us, but TomKat is just being mean :-). Acutally, it could be moreso Tom's decision to keep the baby in hiding...maybe its a scientology practice?
I'll admit, every human being deserves respect and privacy. But can't we at least see a picture of the baby in a blanket at least?
Was it a stunt for their movies or will scientology rule this child's life? Who knows.
2006-07-26 07:12:35 · answer #7 · answered by wearyblossom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure she does exist, her parents just don't want media around her. Some religions think its bad to even bring your baby outside for the first couple months.
2006-07-26 07:12:02 · answer #8 · answered by Cait 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We haven't seen her yet because the parents are paranoid about their child being in the spotlight. Any one remember the Limberg baby?
2006-07-26 07:11:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we haven't seen any glimpse because everyone's so interested in Angelina/Brad baby...
2006-07-26 07:10:02 · answer #10 · answered by ShaH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think so. Tom Cruise is a Wackado though. Who knows. Kate holmes should run for her life!!!
2006-07-26 07:10:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋