Why do Israeli leaders keep occupying Palestinian land?

Question

Israeli refusal to end its occupation according to the UN 242 resolution and Israel want to keep Palestinian land that was never part of Israel.why?

give the facts to any kid he will till you end occupation for peace

When you see no one help you when Israel kill as 4 times civilians and the only help we get is USA veto world condemnations. Life is worthless then who cares

Answer 1

A BIG BULLY WIF A BIG BROTHER BEHIND HIS BACK

Answer 2

What land are you referred to?
Resolution 242 states that Israel is to return land (not all the land) so that it will have secure and defensible borders. Resolution 242 does not set the cease fire line (the green line) as the or a border, and in fact does not say anything about where the border between a Palestinian state and Israel should be, except that Israel's borders must be secure and defensible.

Therefore, there is no established border between Israel and any territorty occupied by persons self-designated as Palestinians. Therefore, there is no "Palestinian Land", there is only the possibility that sometime, in the future, once the suicide bombing stops, that there might be a "Palestinian Land", for the first time in history.

Any student of history knows that gaza was part of Egypt and the West Bank part of Jordan until the 1967 war started by Egypt and Syria, and during which Jordan attacked when it thought Egypt and Syria were winning.

For nearly the last 10 years the PA has refused to negotiate a resolution. Israel withdrew from gaza, and Hamas has refused to negotiate, build up a civil society or even crack down on corruption (its campaign promise), instead, Hamas has fired rockets at civilian targets and kidnapped soldiers.

Israel withdrew from Lebannon pursuant to UN resolutions that required Lebannon to send its regular army to the border and disarm Hizbollah. Lebannon has not only done neither, it has made Hizbollah part of the government.

Hizbollah claims that Israel occupies a tiny, tiny bit of land called Shaba Farm. The UN has formally resolved that Shaba Farm is not and has never been part of Lebannon.

Answer 3

That land has changed hands so many times that it's impossible to say who should have what.
Historically, there never was a Palestinian nation. It was put together by the UN.
As for Israel doing anything against the Palestinians - - - when have you ever heard of an Israeli strapping TNT to his belly and blowing himself and a couple of Palestinians to bits.
I'm not Jewish or Israeli, just fair.

Answer 4

Probably the answer to that question is to maintain security. As a reversal to your question, why do Palestinians keep suicide bombing in areas where innocent people live, when other nations who have in the past suffered from unlawful occupation have not resorted to such barbarism?

The measure of a man’s or nation’s character is how they respond to injustice. If they respond to injustice through peaceable means they deserve a fair hearing, and dare I say favoritism. If they respond with equal injustice as those who oppress them, they deserve to be heard, but with equal suspicion as their oppressors, because they are no different. However, if they resort to actions that are far more pernicious and villainous than those of the occupying force, they deserve no consideration from the global community. They should not receive any clemency from their occupiers. Finally, their enemies should be given carte blanche to do with them as they please.

It should be clear to anyone who has any moral sense that unlawful occupation of land is not commensurate to the execution of innocent civilians. Hence, the Palestine’s retaliatory measures tip the balance of injustice to their end. That, in a nutshell is why the US and any peace loving nation sides with Israel.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a rejoinder to Mark (the questioner) response to what I stated above:

Even if Israel has killed more civilians this was done in the process of getting the militants who cowardly hide among their midst. Keep in mind that if the Israeli army, with all its shear might, were to purposely target Palestinian civilians, nearly half the population or more would have been massacred already. Civilians get killed inadvertently as result of Israeli forces having to make incursions into Palestian terroritories, quite simply because their militants hide amongst the population, so the Palestianian authority share some of the culpability.

Answer 5

Their stated reasons are because without occupation militants keep using border areas to launch attacks into Isreal.

If both sides wouls simpley stick to their own sides of the border there would be a lot less death.

And why can't nations who demand that Isreal stick to a UN resolution respect the formation of Isreal under an earlier UN resolution?

I see wrong doing on all sides, not just one or the other.

Answer 6

"what form of regulation college did you graduate from the lawless regulation college perchance." Hmm, might want to I ask you that you may clarify the way you're such an expert in regulation? enable me ask you extremely bluntly, are you declaring that it truly is an unlawful occupation because it truly is Palestinian land? if so, how does one classify "Palestinian land"? the way I see it, which could purely recommend 2 possibilities: - inner most land: The land is privately owned by using Palestinians - Public land: The land belongs to three type of nationwide or overseas entity it fairly is Palestinian. Now as to the former, it isn't actual neither is it often what human beings recommend even as they say "Palestinian land". quite, you (and others) are with reference to the latter. That being the case, what nationwide entity exists or has existed that makes it "Palestinian land"? seeing that Palestine changed into under no circumstances an self sufficient state, the reply is: there is not any nationwide entity that existed. in case you want to argue otherwise, you also must be prepared to agree that Jordan being interior the West economic corporation changed into an occupation. and no matter if you went ahead and agreed with that, you would nonetheless ought to describe why there changed into no "liberation stream" antagonistic to Jordan and why no man or woman calls it an occupation. As on your really question, it truly is an entire farce. you comprehend o.k. that Israel has elected leaders who've engaged in peace talks with the Palestinians and that the purpose of those peace talks, ought to they have succeeded, might want to bring about a "2 state answer". yet i imagine the ordinary Israeli voter, no matter if he be left or actual wing, knows o.k. that the survival of Israel comes first and subsequently is careful of what a Palestinian state might want to entail given the certainty on the floor. gypsy cat: I wasn't conscious that Yigal Amir, Rabin's assassin, who hails from Hertzaliah (it truly is close to Tel Aviv, in case you probably did not comprehend and that is nowhere close to the West economic corporation), turned right into a "settler". And the finest PMs to barter with the Palestinians were Barak and Netanyahu (convinced, he did negotiate, that actual wing fanatic!) and so some distance as i can tell, they seem alive and correctly. Sharon, BTW, also did an fairly arguable aspect by using retreating from Gaza (earning the ire of the "settlers") yet he's in a coma by using his own awful weight relief plan (ensuing in his weight problems which bring about his poor health) and under no circumstances an assassination attempt.

Answer 7

The Israelis have found that every time they turn the other cheek somebody slaps it. Every time they vacate a piece of land, the bad guys move into it and begin firing rockets at them from a shorter and more effective range. Given these circumstances, what would you do? Or would you like to repeat the Holocaust?

Answer 8

According to the UN resolutions you mentioned the Palestinians
belong in Jordan, not Israel proper.
I Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!
GO ISRAEL!!!