why nazi is wrong?and what diffrent between hitlar and bush??

Answer 1

They don't look like brothers. but I am sure there is a relationship somewhere.

Answer 2

Its wrong because it is a repressive form of fascism. The big difference between Hitler and Bush is that the majority of the country loved Hitler while he was stripping away their freedoms. Also Hitler was much smarter militarily. He took over Poland (the last time a country was engaged in pre-emptive war) in a few weeks and Bush still doesn't have any control in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Answer 3

Nazi is wrong because the nazis with Hitler's leadership massacred a humongous amount of jewish people based solely on their religion. The atrocities that the nazis commited during the Holocaust were horrible and that's why nazi/anything to do with nazi's is wrong.
There is a big difference between Hitler and Bush, Hitler was a dictator and a racist/antisemitic murderer, who led the holocaust and Bush is our president who is not racist or antisemitic and while I may not agree with many of his policies he is not a dictator or a murderer.

Answer 4

what is the difference between Bush and the Nazi? Nothing much other than Bush killed 1000's of innocent people who did not own or controlled economy or banks of his country and killed them on videos.
On the other hand, Nazi doing are only stories we heard on Hollywood just like Ann Frank story who never existed.

Answer 5

Easy difference. Hitler Told the media what to say and ordered the publication of stories to say he was right.

Bush allows the media to lie and say he is wrong. Bush is more interested in getting the job done, than being popular with Americans.

Here is proof (have your read this in the American newspapers that all beat Bush down on WMDs?)"

Iraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein's regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.
Israeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam's WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq's WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam's Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.

So rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam's WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.

Of course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.

Michael Moore, thanks:
Friday, 23 June 2006
When News Lies


WHEN NEWS LIES
Media Complicity and The Iraq War


By Danny Schechter, The News Dissector



A new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."



"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice," says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn't have one without the other."



WHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth.

Answer 6

the National Socialist party ... socialism as a political model doesn't work... Russia is even capitalist now...and I'm not going into the issue of mass scale war, genocide, horrific science experiments and just plain evil...
now, we're able to post questions like this and not have anyone knocking on our doors hours later to "investigate", ... and that's the difference.

Answer 7

Hitler was open about his hate for jews and had 6million of them killed. Bush is using his dislike of arabs to get their oil and he might just send 6 million americans to get killed on foreign soil Basically, the means and reason is different but they both got alot of people killed.

Answer 8

The Nazis are wrong because they lost. If they took over the world, we'd be either dead or speaking German. Hitler served time fighting in WWI.

Answer 9

they both used propaganda very well, both were elected to their position, both used that position to usurp more power than was ever intended, both beat the drums of war to make the people willingly surrender their liberties, both used secret security forces to conduct covert operations against the un-patriotic, both used political and religious symbols to control the people but Hitler truly loved the German people and wanted to make them Europe's elite. See the difference?

Answer 10

Your question is so silly it's sad.

ps. His name is Hitler. Another sign that US education is failing to educate kids on something other than putting condoms on bananas.

Answer 11

You jerk, I dislike Bush but he is nothing like Hitler, Hezbollah are Fascists,get a grip you moron.