Do you think that teachers should have the right to refuse their service to kids that give them a hard time?

Answer 1

To all those folks who say that a teacher has no business teaching if he/she can't get all students to behave, you are invited to my classroom! I teach high school and some of these kids are coming to school under the influence of just frosted flakes and orange juice. I have had several students in past years who fly into rages as they come down off whatever high they were on. One student stood up and shouted profanities at me and then picked up his chair and threw it across the room because I woke him up to do a test. Now, I don't care what profession you are in, every person has a right to do his or her job in a safe environment. Do I have to keep this student in my classroom and jeopardize the safety of my other students and myself? Hell no. One year I taught 6th grade. Do you think those kids are more docile? Absolutely not. Shortly after the bell rang to start class, one girl jumped up and tackled another girl to floor and began beating her head against the floor. When I intervened, the girl who did the tackling put her hands around my throat and began choking me. I requested that she be transferred out of my class and my administrators told me that she could not transferred because I taught the "gifted" class and she was in the "gifted" program. I said that was fine, but if she ever laid a hand on me again, I would have her arrested and prosecuted for assault and battery. The fight had apparently started in another classroom and was brought into my classroom because their previous teacher had let it escalate. Does that mean I am a bad teacher? Absolutely not. My point is that there are many student behaviors that teachers do not have total control over. That does not reflect on teaching ability. Keeping these disruptive students in our classes; however, will reduce our effectiveness with the other students who are there to learn. If I have one disruptive student and 34 other students who are ready to learn, I most certainly will remove the one disruptive student to preserve the learning environment for the other 34. That is my responsibility as a teacher. Parents and administrators can teach proper behavior.

Answer 2

It would be a dream come true; however, being that most teachers work for the public school system, there are certain steps that must happen before a student is withdrawn from a classroom or school. Most definitely do some children cause problems in the class, which in takes away from the rest of the class from learning.

But, nowadays, being a teacher is more than just that. We unfortunately are parents, counselors, confidants, best friends, and the first ones in line when it comes to the well being and protection of our children. So, before you want to kick the child out of the class for giving you such a hard time, try and figure out what is wrong.

Maybe the kid stayed up all night because mom and dad were fighting, maybe the kid didn't get breakfast, maybe they were left home alone. Just be there, and see what can be fixed in the immediate first, then move on from there.

Answer 3

I didn't when I first started teaching, now I think it may unfortunately be an appropriate action. Too many times an incorrigible student who knows the absolute limits makes too many disruptions and class disturbances for the other 98% who really are not a problem. I used to think all students deserve an education. As a high school teacher, I now think that a high school diploma is an earned privilege and not an inalienable right. I would not take lightly the act of refusing to teach a child, but there is only so much one person can do with so many students for a class a day.

Answer 4

It really depends on how you define a "hard time". A kid that is chatty or is a pain in the neck you just have to deal with. That's what teaching is. A student who disrupts the class to the point where it is effecting the ability of the other students to learn is a bit different. In that case, I think that removal from the class is a last resort. This actually happened to me a few years ago. The student was really bad, got other students to act up, and made it difficult for my special education students in the class to stay on track. He was removed from my class with less than a month in the school year but I still assigned him work and was responsible for his grades.

If a student is violent, then there needs to be an evaluation made as to whether or not they should be allowed into the building, let alone your classroom.

Answer 5

I teach at a public school, so technically, we can't "refuse service" to any child. But I do believe that children who cannot function in a respectful manner in the classroom should be removed and dealt with, by the administration and/or the parent. I strongly believe that THE OTHER children in the classroom have just as much right to learn, and when that right is interfered with by an unruly student, that student needs to be removed immediately and without hesitation. Teachers have a right to teach and children have a right to learn. Period. If a student can't follow the rules, he has lost his right to share the classroom with others.

Answer 6

Absolutely not. Even if a student and teacher may not get along, I do not feel that it should effect the student's education. Every student has the right to ask for help from their teacher and to learn in the classroom. It is up to the teacher to teach each student and be fair and firm to all students.

Answer 7

I think they should take steps in correcting the kids behavior. I dont think they should by any means take crap off of someones bratty kid. Contact the parents, the principal and if the behavior doesnt stop, suspend them or transfer them.
I agree with boxing fan 4. The ones who just wont listen, should be given an alternative. Especially if the parents are willing to help. Some parents leave the responsibility to someone else cause they dont want to be bothered.

Answer 8

I think it shouldn't be taken that far, I think it's fine the way it is. The teacher can send the kid out of the classroom and that is very similar to refusing to teach the kid, because the kid is missing out on the lesson.

Answer 9

I wholeheartedly consider the community provider. i'd be more effective than chuffed to do a touch community provider even as in college (pretty if it fairly does get me $4000 in route of training) besides as in the different time of my existence. I do community provider without it being inspired or mandatory and that i'd love for another American to do a touch too. that incorporates seniors who've the flexibility. i don't think in a draft. i'd purely strive against in our protection rigidity if i presumed it turned right into a only war. you may want to favor to study the e book of Revelation lower back...

Answer 10

Absolutely. A teacher's job is to teach, not to babysit the brats that are sent to them. The parent is the one who should be teaching their kids to respect people and to behave; those who don't shouldn't expect teachers to have to deal with it while other children are trying to learn.