it's hard to be completely certain b/c grams are a mass and mililiters are volume. but when I converted the grams to ounces and then the ounces to mililiters (I couldn't find a direct conversion), I got 156.473 mililiters. however, the first ounces was mass and the second ounces was liquid ounces, so I don't know if that's accurate.
2006-07-26 05:11:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by heterophobicgirl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
you will be pretty close if you use just a hair less than 150 mL
150 mL of water is 150 grams, And pool chemical are slightly heavier than water.
Unless you are proforming some sort of scientific experiment where you must have thing accurate, just use about 150 mL
2006-07-26 13:06:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by farrell_stu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, it then depends on the density of the pool chemicals. Milliliters is a volume and grams is a mass. If you don't know the density, you can't do this calculation.
2006-07-26 12:07:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by mathematician 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1000 L = 1 m^3
1 ml is almost equal to 150 g
2006-07-26 12:17:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Litres are volume, and grams are mass. If you want to solve this, you would need the density of the chemical to convert it (ie. grams/litre)
2006-07-26 12:08:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Loulabelle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can not measure weight bu millilitres which is a volume unit, unless you have the density of the particular material.
2006-07-26 17:35:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rick Blaine 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you need to know the density of the substance
2006-07-26 12:08:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by bala 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think density is required
2006-07-26 13:59:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Aditi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋