English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And why haven't we not yet?
Islamic nations have had female leaders (Pakistan). So have poor nations (Bangledesh) and wealthy nations (Germany). Nations similar to the U.S.(Great Britian & Canada) have had female leaders as have nations disimilar to the U.S. (Mozambique).

So what's up?

2006-07-26 04:38:26 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

18 answers

1) Most of those nations had women leaders in the name of "Political Correctness". This doesn't change how they are treated in society. This only hides the truth from the world.

2) There will never be a female president of the US. The UK and Israel both have had one, but never again. There must be a reason.

2006-07-26 06:24:13 · answer #1 · answered by man_id_unknown 4 · 2 4

i imagine the U. S. of u.s. ought to get a president interior the subsequent fifty years. The richest united states of america interior the international and maximum effective ought to take care of to have a woman ruling the position. In Africa there's a woman president or perhaps there they're a step added than the States. even with the very incontrovertible certainty that, the States is hard to regulate with Iraq and that and that i'd favor to work out the States going a step added, having a woman president earlier my technology will die. it truly is sturdy that uk, the position i also stay, had a woman PM. there changed into no female president by any ability in u.s.. i imagine they nonetheless image female as too emotional and as housewives. u.s. ought to take that huge step, no longer now, no longer day after today, yet interior the destiny, a minimum of in about fifty years time because the topic matters it truly is dealing with now might want to be only too a lot. outstanding question however!

2016-11-26 00:49:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, but probably not for another 20 - 30 years. They will need to have a female VP first. Conservatives, and even some liberals, are not ready for a female leader. For the remaining super power, a woman leader would be cinstrued as weakness.

2006-07-26 04:45:19 · answer #3 · answered by ceprn 6 · 0 0

Yes. Someday. Society will likely hold her to a high standard as the first woman to take the job. Would require a no-nonsense bi#@! who can hang with the guys.

2006-07-26 04:44:32 · answer #4 · answered by El Gringo 237 3 · 0 0

Yes---she is due to start in January 2009

2006-07-26 04:42:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, I believe we will. And I believe she will have a black vice-president! Finally...lets get down to business with the USA!

2006-07-26 05:08:24 · answer #6 · answered by Sassy OLD Broad 7 · 0 0

Give a monkey a typewriter and an infinite amount of time and the monkey will write all the books ever published. Give Americans the vote and an infinite amount of time and they will...................

2006-07-26 05:02:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

dollar to a donut says hillary clinton and condolisa rice run together in 2008

2006-07-26 04:43:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what if elected???.....wud the woman leader go along with her man...no male wud go like that.....we have to search woman spinster/single again
leader for them in usa....that is a major problem

2006-07-26 05:00:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, with the next election.

2006-07-26 05:17:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers