English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ok yesterday i was watching sports i seen that a-rod made a comment that he comparing himself to tiger woods... well he said that tiger was down before but he came back from his slump was it smart for him to compare himself to tiger woods.. i think he wasn't smart yes tiger was down that was because of his dad death and a-rod has his promblems yes but anyone does no one perfect... tell me what you think

2006-07-26 04:37:14 · 11 answers · asked by lil_carebear42069 1 in Sports Baseball

11 answers

A-Rod is simply providing the media with a soundbite.

Should he compare himself to Woods? I don't think so.

Should the media swarm him after every Yankees game regardless of the outcome? No.

I'm getting sick of every day ending with the all-important A-Rod interview. Why even play the game? It's always about him, no matter the score, no matter the statistics.

As a Yankee fan, I can't wait until he "pulls out of his slump" in the national media's eyes... This circus is getting out of control.

2006-07-26 05:52:33 · answer #1 · answered by Baseball Fanatic 5 · 9 3

i think that Tiger is a caliber of athelete that very few can compare to, simply because he's so focused and so clutch. If you get close to him he kicks it up to a whole other level. Tiger, it can be argued is the best to play his sport (In my opinion hes only behind Jack Nicklaus), this is not true, however, for A-rod, who is not on the same level as baseball's titans.

I also think it is bizzare that he would compare his bad game to an athlete whose father recently passed away. A bad game is not nearly the same as the emotional pain tiger had to go through. (Besides, A-Rod lead the AL in errors last time i checked)

2006-07-26 04:44:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He shouldn't compare himself to Tiger. He's a hundred times better than Tiger, because hitting a baseball is a hundred times harder than hitting a golf ball. A baseball is coming at you at 90 MPH and the pitcher puts all kind of spin on it to fool the batter. A golf ball just sits there. You can take your time and line up your shot however you want it. How is that any sort of challenge? Golf is a total joke of a "sport".

2006-07-26 04:43:46 · answer #3 · answered by Steven S 3 · 0 0

Right now, A-Rod should compare himself to John Van de Velde. He hasn't done anything when it counted the most.

2006-07-26 04:39:53 · answer #4 · answered by Will the Thrill 5 · 0 0

no, tiger has been proven to dominate his matches, unlike a-rod who isnt even the best player in the game

2006-07-26 04:41:09 · answer #5 · answered by Justin I 2 · 0 0

ummm, NOOOOOOO!! why? well because tiger is a proven winner on the biggest stage. a-rod puts up great numbers, but has never won the big one.

2006-07-26 04:40:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

why would he compare himself to ANYONE? Just admit that you're in a "slump" and get your a$$ out of it. Actions speak louder than words!!!!!

2006-07-26 05:13:16 · answer #7 · answered by beckett's girl 3 · 0 0

No. A-Rod is too large a slipslop.

2006-07-26 05:49:35 · answer #8 · answered by littleindian039 3 · 0 0

Sure, both atheletes who have been in slumps!

2006-07-26 04:40:31 · answer #9 · answered by Wounded duckmate 6 · 0 0

yes

2006-07-26 04:44:54 · answer #10 · answered by metsfan988 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers