English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Seriously Bush should not have been voted in office for a second term.

2006-07-26 04:13:12 · 17 answers · asked by sosevere 2 in Politics & Government Government

17 answers

Bush was elected with a greater number of votes than either time Clinton was elected, so apparently many people feel he is the right man for the job. And he will go, in 2009, unless they decide to keep him around, like FDR, for another term or two.

Wouldn't that be great... I can read the banners now...

"Another 8 in '08"

2006-07-26 04:19:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Many Americans (roughly 50%) did not want Bush and believe he did not really win the last election. Remember there were problems with a key state and the voting forms?
Bush will go at the end of this current term, we only have to wait two more years. The question is: will the world survive two more years of his aggressive intervention?

2006-07-26 07:32:52 · answer #2 · answered by simon2blues 4 · 0 0

"Is it just me or does BUSH HAVE TO GO???
Seriously Bush should not have been voted in office for a second term."

Welcome to democracy.

2006-07-26 04:20:15 · answer #3 · answered by X 2 · 0 0

Did you vote? And, if so, how many people did you bring to the polls?

Also, we have a little something called the Electoral College. Did you bother to participate in your local precinct convention this year to shift the dymamics of our fair method of making sure small states are represented?

If the answer was "no" to either of the preceding questions, then stop your yammerin.'

2006-07-26 05:02:46 · answer #4 · answered by creton4 3 · 0 0

It's not just you, he really has to go.

I think it's about time that the people took back government, don't you? The politicians work for us, after all, but the ones in office don't seem to have a grasp of what we, the people, want. People seem to have forgotten that they represent us, not the other way around.

2006-07-26 04:19:57 · answer #5 · answered by Cassie 3 · 0 0

why??

All Bush's moves or proposals were either rejected or authorized by the Congress.

Get over it, Bush is here to stay till 2009.

2006-07-26 04:23:36 · answer #6 · answered by Quickie 3 · 0 0

If he was not on office we would still have this war in Iraq. Israel would still be fighting Hezbollah. Bush did not start any of this stuff.

2006-07-26 04:38:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He used us. War is the best way to stay in office. Do we really have two more years with him?

2006-07-26 04:17:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush has to go & he will, just not soon enough for me!

2006-07-26 04:16:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Seriously 63 million of us seriously disagree with you.

2006-07-26 04:16:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers