English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who Is Better Then The Best In Them

2006-07-26 04:11:01 · 30 answers · asked by koool_xain 1 in Sports Cricket

30 answers

RAZZAK GOES NAPPING BETWEEN KALLIS AND FLINTOFF.......

BUT BETWEEN FLINTOFF AND KALLIS ITS A TOUGH CHOICE.......
BUT,I'LL CHOOSE KALLIS AS HE IS MORE EXPERIENCED AND MORE FITTER THAN FREDDIE...........
SO ALL THE WAY KALLIS...........

2006-07-26 04:50:10 · answer #1 · answered by VIVEK 3 · 2 0

Abdur Razzaq of Pakistan is a good all rounder but his main weapon is bowling. He will bat in some occations only. So he is ruled out of the competition.

Comming to Jack Kallis of SouthAfrica. He is a very good no.3 batsman and also one of the best batsmen in the present day cricket. He bowls too. His bowling is somewhat weak when compared to his batting ability. So he is a batting all-rounder. So he is some what backward due to this reason.

Comming to Andrew Flintoff of England. Flintoff is a very good bowler for England and also more dependant batsman too. His ability to bowl is very much equal to his batting skills. So he can be a genuine all-rounder.

A player is more useful to a team when he is an all-rounder. And when comparing the abilities to balance both the arts,i.e., Batting and bowling, Flintoff comes forward of the three.

So considering the above views, I can say that Andrew Flintoff is Better than the other two.

Hope you are convinced with this explanation.

2006-07-26 12:25:24 · answer #2 · answered by Sherlock Holmes 6 · 0 0

Razzaq is the better of the three. He is the one who is more reliable for any given situation. Kallis doesn't score at a rapid pace. Flintoff doesn't play a patient game even if required beyond a certain extent. Razzaq does both.

2006-07-26 11:59:44 · answer #3 · answered by vpdipak 1 · 0 0

Freddie Flintoff

2006-07-28 10:01:12 · answer #4 · answered by farhan_only_4_u 2 · 0 0

I think Kallis is the best with Flintoff coming next. Kallis has played many more innings that has saved south africa than Flintof. Thus Kallis is better.

2006-07-26 22:17:08 · answer #5 · answered by Immanuel Alwin 2 · 1 0

I like Kallis...but Razzaq Is also quite good.......Flintoff not bad, but I like Kallis most...

2006-07-27 00:24:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i like razzaq in this case just because he's a bit more calm, patient, and reliable than Flintoff. Kallis however, when hot, he's hot.

2006-07-26 15:43:38 · answer #7 · answered by wiseonekms 3 · 0 0

i think Flintoff is the best, Kallis is ok & Razzaq is nowhere in comparison with them

2006-07-28 18:58:32 · answer #8 · answered by Rahul 2 · 0 0

hi,this is a toff question.but flintoff is best in all 3.because flintoff find a captaincy in a very short time.it is not short this is a long time.i know razzaq is a good all rounder but he never came into the top ten ranking.and his bating is good but not best with bowling.he know only big shots than his test bating is so week.Kalli's is good but not now.he is doing lots of for Africa.but flint off is doing more hard for team batting ,bowling,Fielding and now cap tansy.

2006-07-27 07:26:18 · answer #9 · answered by sabasebadajuari 1 · 0 0

Kallis

2006-07-27 04:37:44 · answer #10 · answered by Joe85 2 · 0 0

Kallis

2006-07-26 21:44:01 · answer #11 · answered by sean 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers