Does anyone see the parallel with the precise demolition of WTC and Israeli air strikes?

Question

I find it hard to believe that airplanes alone that hit one side of a huge building would cause a perfectly straight freefall demolition of it. We see how precise the Israeli forces are and how easily funded they are. We also see how incredibly imprecise and unadvanced the "terrorists" are. We also see how quickly the "terrorists" say they did the incredible feat of shooting down helicopters and blowing up buildings and yet it takes a while before Israel even says they were involved with killing UN soldiers never mind about blowing up WTC.

Answer 1

not another conspiracy theory at least try to give some facts support ur claims.

Answer 2

That's like saying a light post is in on a killing when a car runs into it. After all, the car just wraps around the light post, and the light post was right there waiting for the car. So if someone dies, did the light post company plan it?
I guess our feeble government was able to secretly plan a demolition, drill tens of thousands of hols into the structure and detonate it, and no one knew about it. Hey, maybe it was Elvis and the Easter Bunny. It was Saudi nationals and a few others, back by Bin Laden. That's why we went after Saddam and invaded Iraq. See the ability of our government to get things right?

Answer 3

I see your point and agree with you about the free fall 'cause'. However, most of the rest of this is conjecture based on very circumstantial evidence. After recent events, I would not put it past the Israelis to have tried to pull this off, but there is no proof and only a slight chance that their objective would have been accomplished.

Answer 4

Wowe! Wowe!

I don't believe the airplanes caused those building to fall in the manner they did either: But lets not forget that some of those precise toys of destruction that Israel uses are provided, to them, by our own government.

This is a good time to examin the collapse of the towers, because we are finally starting to get some cold hard evidence, that show us, how those buildings came down so nicely. Here is some of the most recent irrefutable evidence available today.

1. We now have eye witness accounts, from people inside of the building, telling of explosions taking place, on different floors, including lower floors, just before the buildings went down. Many of the witnesses, were silenced when the buildings collapsed, but their accounts live on, in just released radio recordings. (I'll try to find them on the Internet for you. I heard the firemens radio conversations, not to long ago.) They went something like this, "What's going on! I'm on the 22nd floor, and I just heard an explosion." "I'm on 72, and I heard one too."

2. Photographs of the buildings, just before it went down, show molten metal flowing out, from the building. Structural steel requires temperatures, well beyond burning jet fuel, to melt. Further, the color of the glowing molten metal, is also representative of high temperatures, beyond that of burning jet fuel. See source below, for detailed information, regarding structural steel melting points etc.

3. A chemical analysis of the molten metal, found at the site, shows traces of a chemical called, "Thermate". Thermate charges are used by professional demolition crews, to cut through steel beams, to demolish buildings. Incidentally, the samples were recovered by a member, of the clean up crew, who kept it as a souvenir memento. Most of the scrap metal, including the pools of molten steel, were recovered by a demolition crew, and discarded. There are though photos, at ground zero, showing beams that have been shearded at a right angle: Slag is shown dripping from the process. Click on photo, in website below; for a close up examination.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

4. Thermate traces have also been found, inside the bodies, of those exposed to the gases from the molten debris; people such as firemen and clean up crew members.

I found the following video clips, while conducting research. They do have a bias slant, but they are also very intriguing. Once you see them, you'll never be able to see the 9-ll tragedy the same again: I know I won't.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4258946892514662399&q

Answer 5

Had you read any of the forsenical data, or seen any of the documentaries done on the fall of those buidlings, or if you had ever been inside either of the two towers, you'd realize that it was ENTIRELY possible. And an airstrike,or artillery have distinct sounds to them, none of which were ever heard when the towers were struck, ask any of the military veterans who were there for their opinions.