English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

29 answers

oh yeah....lets put an even colder hearted sadistic man in office..thats just what we need ...first we have bush who has unoffically launched world war 3 but then lets go ahead and put a man in charge that is gonna go ahead and finish us off..i mean come on is this question for real

and in case you didn't notice ..this was a sarcastic answer

2006-07-26 02:46:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Let's see: Saddam Hussein did not threaten, provoke or attack the United States.

Bush illegally and unconstitutionally invaded another sovereign country for two really lame reasons: 1) He wanted to 'finish' what his daddy started during Desert Storm and satisfy the vendetta the Bush family had against Hussein for not complying to its wishes; and 2) LimpDick Cheney wants all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands so that he and his buddies at Halliburton and Exxon-Mobil can get richer and richer and richer.
___________________________________________________
Check out the new blog: BUSHWACKER!
www.blogger.com
http://al-aback.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________

Hussein massacred tens of thousands of his own people because he believed them to be a threat to his regime. Bush has massacred tens of thousands of Iraqis for no justifiable reason.

Hussein was a despot who made his own laws and ruled with fierce dictatorial strong-arm tactics, where citizens had few rights. Bush has turned a free country into a police state where citizens are now presumed guilty until proven innocent, totally disregarding the law of the land, and our U.S. Constitution.

Hussein tortured, raped, and abused prisoners because he was in control of a country that had little respect for law or human decency. Bush tortured, raped, and abused prisoners because he simply disregarded our nation's laws and our tradition for being a humane, compassionate, moral society.

As despicable as sub-humans like Hussein, Hitler, and Stalin were, I don't think we should be putting George Bush on any kind of pedestal. He certainly is evil, corrupt, incompetent, and cowardly in the way he "leads" America. Bush should be tried for high treason, AND face an international tribunal for crimes against humanity. He is not much better than Hussein. That's the trouble with Americans: we always think we're so much better than everyone else. But, in fact, we can be just as cruel, inhumane, and evil as the next guy. Should Hussein be installed as President of the U.S.? Certainly not. But George Bush should have never been installed as President of the U.S. either; he is no better than his nemesis, Hussein.

PREDICTION: There will be NO TROOP WITHDRAWALS from Iraq until Dick Cheney has an iron-clad, rock solid arrangement in place to take all of Iraq's OIL.

PREDICTION: As soon as Bush can figure out a plausible reason for illegally invading Iran, he'll do it (but weapons of mass destruction won't work this time). Why? Because he and Cheney want Iran's OIL.

QUESTION: Why, if we're so dedicated to spreading democracy throughout the world, do we not invade other countries ruled by other evil despots? Because those other countries have no OIL. So we allow the genocide, rapes, and torture continue unabated. -RKO-

2006-07-26 10:29:58 · answer #2 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 0

No, because it would be too much of a leap.

Perhaps he could first start out as a mayor of a mid-sized city. Perhaps a city like Columbus, Ohio.

Then on to a two-term govenorship, in Ohio I would guess.

Then, he could join the Democratic party, since they like him so much, and run for the Presidency.

2006-07-26 11:46:56 · answer #3 · answered by clockwork_oranje2002 3 · 0 0

umm let me think how about NO that would be like putting a felon in charge of the country but if it could happen which it couldnt he would probably be shot down which is what he deserves anyway. I guess he would get what is owed to him.

2006-07-26 09:52:01 · answer #4 · answered by toni j 3 · 0 0

Hahah you just love to be yelled at dont you? Can't wait to see some of the answers to this one.

But yeah he couldn't because he's not a natural born US citizen.

2006-07-26 09:46:30 · answer #5 · answered by Dan Theman 4 · 0 0

Never happen. He's not native-born -- a requirement under the U.S. Constitution.

2006-07-26 10:41:31 · answer #6 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 0 0

You must be one of his minion spies sent here by him years ago to scope out flaws in our system and take advantage of them. You jerk, I think any "true American" would never ever say anything like that, even jokingly.

2006-07-26 09:47:57 · answer #7 · answered by MyBestFriendIsMuslim.....So? 4 · 0 0

You have to be born in the U.S. to be president.

2006-07-26 09:45:02 · answer #8 · answered by Rjmail 5 · 0 0

I think you're a complete retard for asking this. Idiot. I think you should be locked in a portable toilet and set on fire.

2006-07-26 09:46:59 · answer #9 · answered by Mongo 2 · 0 0

U dont deserve an answer

2006-07-26 09:46:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anthony4Christ 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers