Who is the real aggressor / culprit?
2006-07-26 02:35:01 · 13 answers · asked by Optimistic 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Well here's some facts which may indicate. The Un on Friday wished to condemn the attack but USA vetoe the proposal (only The US). The same day the Israeli weapons order from America is stepped up ahead of schedule because of the conflict. In the meantime Iran and Syria continue to beg the UN or independent powers to intervene diplomatically. Russia will not because Lebanon to Isreal is like Chechnya to Russia and wouldn't look good. The European nations wont half because they cant spare the force and half because they're pro-American. China dare not stir this for fear of edging toward bi-polar relations with America.
So-where does this stem from originally-US weapons reign down on ambulances from Israeli hands, US vetoes silence the UNited Nations Council. US diplomacy does nothing as yet as the death toll rises. Remember-the US orchestrates this because it is yet another warning-Islamic terrorist harbouring countries, watch out because any who fire on you are our allies. We are right and you are wrong, we will prevail and you will fall.
2006-07-26 02:47:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
First of all, wars are never orchestrated. Nobody truly controls them at all.
Second, there's never a clear "bad guy" in war. Both sides have got their reasons, but you can usually ascribe more blame to one than the other.
The only active players in this war are Israel, Lebanon and Palestine. Iran and the U.S. have little or nothing to do with it.
Israel is attacking Hezbollah (a terrorist organization) in Palestine and Lebanon because Hezbollah attacked Israel.
On the border with Palestine, Hezbollah attacked an Israeli military unit on the Israeli side of the border. They killed some soldiers, and captured another. Israel then invaded Palestine with the main goals of getting back the missing soldier and disarming Hezbollah.
After Israel entered Palestine (to the west), Hezbollah terrorists again attacked from Lebanon (to the north). This time, they killed more israeli soldiers and captured two more. Israel responded by attacking Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.
It is important to note that both the government of Palestine and Lebanon have high-level officials in Hezbollah. So, it is unlikely that their governments didn't know about the attacks. Israel says those governments had a responsibility to help stop the terrorists, since they attacked from their countries.
I think its safe to say, that in this case, Hezbollah is the culprit, and both Palestine and Lebanon have been covering their eyes and pretending not to see.
2006-07-26 02:51:33 · answer #2 · answered by Privratnik 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Western nations in general by standing by and watching the Israelis and Arabs fight. The larger agenda is what everyone is missing with respect to the ME problems. There are three religions that all claim Jerusalem as a "Holy" city...Jews, Muslims, and Christians. Two of the factions have been battling for years...Jews and Muslims while the third Christians are biding time. The overall plan is to allow the Jews and Muslims to become sufficiently weakened paving the way to ONWARD CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS and the restoration of Jerusalem to Christianity. So bottom line is the Western nations in general manipulate the situation accordingly. PEACE!
2006-07-26 02:41:16 · answer #3 · answered by thebigm57 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I definitely have felt that there'll be a war with exceedingly plenty lots of the Muslim international locations against Israel. i'm particular this is going to happen in the subsequent 2 years. The Muslim international locations gets their war. I used to ask your self how all this "one worldwide government" in the Christian prophecy could turn up. Now i'm particular this is going to likely be with the aid of fact out of a hatred for Israel, many countries will unite. those that part with Israel would be seen as rebels, perchance, perchance against the regulation to part with them. many people extraordinarily Christians are feeling this strongly suitable now. I extraordinarily felt a undertaking approximately this month, and look how Iran is voicing approximately nukes and u . s . a . of america to get out of the midsection east. I felt considerable differences could happen this month, in basic terms uncertain what. Israel will exchange into Israel
2016-10-08 08:21:10 · answer #4 · answered by rotanelli 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of the above. Try Hezbollah,the terrorist dumbasses who
actually thought they could kidnap Israeli soldiers and get a more
"limited" reaction. If you asked anyone with a brain what would happen in such a hypothetical situation before it happened,they
would tell you the Israelis would respond with the deadliest of
force.
2006-07-26 02:47:08 · answer #5 · answered by Alion 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think israel and america had planned an inbvasion way before the only thing they needed was a reason to kill and they got it when some terrorist captured two israel soldiers .soon usa will take over every small and helpless country who doesnt threaten uncle sam with nukes some one like south korea
2006-07-26 03:22:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Arms dealers
2006-07-26 02:41:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The conductor. Get it? Orchestra, contuctor! Lol. Yeah, I know it's lame but you'll like it anyways. I hope.
2006-07-26 11:30:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hezbollah and Hamas--need I say anything else??
2006-07-26 03:33:41 · answer #9 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're assuming its being controlled.
2006-07-26 08:05:02 · answer #10 · answered by Alexander Shannon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋