(ADULT TOPIC) What does feminism gain from homosexuality?

Question

[ONLY MATURE ANSWERS]

1) Why are feminists insulted when men crave women sexualy, but are advocates for homosexuals who also have sexual cravings? Don't homosexuals have night-clubs, pornography, strippers, etc...?

2) Why is a heterosexual man's lust for women blamed on society and chauvanism, but a homosexual's lust for the same sex is justified, by feminists, as "genetic" ?

3) There are many other sexual fetishes that people mock, laugh at, and/or hate, (such as sadists, pedaphiles, etc...). Why do feminists advocate for homosexuality only?

4) Does homosexuality somehow benefit the feminist agenda?

Answer 1

Homosexuality beneifts the extremist feminist agenda. Those are the women who hate men and use falsehoods to spread their anti-male propaganda. They are the women who find it "degrading" if a woman stays home and actually raises her children. They are the women who forcefully insist that abortion is the key to female freedom. They think that the "opening" of society and its sexual restrictions actually liberates women, instead of sending them back centuries, which is what has actually happened. You see where I'm going here? So of course these women want to promote homosexuality... no kids, no abortions, and no men. And don't mention things like lesbian clubs or gay porn... people like this always hate it when you point out the hypocrisy in their arguments.

Of course, as usual, the loudest and most obnoxious of a group rarely speak for the entire group. Most women simply want to be left alone and treated fairly... we don't need to insist that we are all EXACTLY the same. In fact, most of us revel in our "womanliness" and appreciate it when a man recognizes it too.

Answer 2

1. Feminists are NOT insulted when men crave women sexually, it is evident that you have read and have no knowledge of any branch of feminism or its texts. You seem to come from the narrow minded and ignorant angle of feminism which the media portrays - a lot of angry women who refuse to get married and hate all men who walk the earth etc. This is particularly sad, considering this isn't even what feminism is about. If anything, many feminists want a better understanding of womens sexuality - not for women to completely ignore their sexuality which seems to be what you suggest here. Also, you confuse homosexuality with feminism. What exactly is your point about homosexuality? Feminists do not advocate only homosexuality and this is something upon which you are grossly misunderstood.
2. Mans lust for women again, is not blamed on society and chauvanism by feminists. You are probably referring to works of radical feminism - of which I doubt you have read any. Not all feminists are radical. Further - not all feminists hate men (white or otherwise) and not all feminists think their advances are chauvanistic. Again, you have a pretty single minded and uneducated view on this matter.
3. I really don't know where you get this link with homosexuality from... feminists don't hate all heterosexuals and love homosexuals. This is a gross generalisation - you really need to read up on your topics more.

Answer 3

You seem to see different similarities than I do.
First, not all feminists think the same. Some I can't stand either. But I think most wouldn't fit in the jacket you have tailored.

You express the feeling that you are being treated unfairly by feminists, but that's precisely their point: they do not want women to be treated unfairly anymore. Your feeling is new. May be transitional.

What most feminists reject isn't men craving sex, it's men's predatory attitude towards sex. So men who crave men are just as OK as men who crave women, but predators are bad in both kinds of men. Stalking isn't natural, it's learned behavior.

The same holds for what you call "sexual fetishes". It's not the same to want lo lick a woman's foot or collecting bras under your bed than to want to have sex with a kid. This is not a "fetish" thing because children are not things. Nor can homosexuality be called a fetish. Most feminists favor sexual liberty as long as it involves consenting adults.

No contest on the "genetic" argument. I will have to think about it.

Answer 4

1) I am NOT insulted when men crave women sexually and my advocacy of homosexuals extends only to their civil rights. Their sexual cravings are their own business.

2) I do NOT blame man's lust for women on society and chauvinism. I blame men's LACK OF SELF-CONTROL over their lust on society and chauvinism.

3) Again, we advocate for the civil rights of homosexuals. Homosexuality is NOT a fetish. You're comparing apples and oranges!

4) I have no data on homosexuality benefiting the "feminist agenda".

Answer 5

to a certain extent yes , natali barney was a feminist lesbian ........... however not all women who fight for their rights are homosexual ....... homosexuality is psychological need to be wanted by a same gender , which i consider as an anomaly ... if we are to assume that human beings are animals with a brain that different them from others in the animal kingdom..... we would say even in the animal kingdom , you do not have a homosexual lion or a cat... that is why i think homosexuality is chemical disturbance in the brain , that resulted from a traumatic experience , anti social actions or simply BRAINWASH.

Feminism though , can not be confused with homosexuality , if women fight for their rights to be equal in terms of salaries and wages that does not mean that they are homosexuals.

it does not make sense to say that men are chauvinist because they crave women , it is normal , but when it becomes a reason for having a higher salary , or some sort of "favor " it becomes chauvinistic ...

in fact i see homosexuality benefiting from the feminist movement not otherwise. as it extends to the argument that women to have thier rights , they need to be with other women and have sex with other women , because they understand each other better , which is utter nonsense

Answer 6

why do you make such sweeping generalizations about "feminism"? - your questions (and there are many of them on Yahoo answers) are not thought provoking nor do they promote any real discourse. You sound rather uninformed on the issues with which you choose to "debate" and instead come off as an idiot. Please stop and go read a book.