Do you think Bush Administration encourages its own officials to voice dissenting opinions for Bush to hear?

Question

I think this is the no. 1 problem. The party line is never challenged, and so ideas are not well thought out - potential problems are not identified. I believe that Bush is, by nature, a very vindictive man - that makes even honorable people afraid to speak up and express a view contrary to the one the President embraces.

Answer 1

No.

Answer 2

Is that a joke. Of course they don't encourage the staff to voice dissenting opinions, This is the most secretive government since Nixion. And Bush is slowly making Nixion look like a logical and well intentioned individual. I suspect that Bush and cronies will have the white house bugged before they leave if a democrat someone wins the 08 election.

Answer 3

You'll never know but COMMON sense dictates that people at work, government, baseball teams, everybody wants people with like minds and philosophy. They awork as a team so you normally do not seek people who will disagree with you. Policies etc weren't formed the day the President took office.

It is just a false issue that libs try to use to attack Bush when they have nothing else to do.

Because things are thought out but you don't like the people doesn't mean they didn't consider all options.

You could be a moron.

Answer 4

The answer to your question has been reported on every major news channel. It's yes. Whenever a dissenting opinion is raised the dissenter has been bannished. Anybody remember Colin Powell, he didn't like the "intellegence" and wasn't in favor of invading Iraq, not only was he right, but he was also gone.

Answer 5

If I had to guess, I bet they really do have discussions where people can give dissenting opinions, but that's all behind closed doors. I think once the decision has been made, no one is allowed to speak out against it after that; certainly not publicly.

Answer 6

That is ridiculous. The people in the administration speak openly in private with him, not in the public eye.

My husband and I are good friends with someone on the Joint Chiefs, and he has told us that the way the President works is that he likes the administration to present a unified front to the public, but in private meetings everyone is encouraged to speak their minds.

Answer 7

Waterboarding isn't torture. that's grotesque, to make sure, even with the undeniable fact that it does no longer completely injure or harm people who're subjected to it. The Geneva Conventions practice basically to uniformed protection rigidity workers. they do no longer practice to terrorists or non-uniformed warring parties. Patrick Leahy is a left-wing fool. we are actually not likely to place administration officers on trial for conflict crimes while they have been informed via the Justice branch that waterboarding exchange into no longer a type of torture. Do you comprehend that?