2006-07-25 22:49:08 · 6 answers · asked by moon walker 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It depends on the nature of the emergency. If the emergency concerns a natural disaster which does not have security implications then the security aspect/plans/laws will not be enacted. In essence it will not be one rule but a series of measures from which the authority will select in accordence with their perceived threat.
2006-07-25 22:58:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Emergency law supercedes all regular laws.It is used only when there is a situation.
2006-07-26 06:19:37 · answer #2 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
killercybermano@yahoo.co.uk
2006-07-26 05:56:45 · answer #3 · answered by killercyberman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a constitutional attorney. Ask Ann Coulter.
2006-07-26 05:52:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ERM :s
What?
2006-07-26 05:53:28 · answer #5 · answered by Tony T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!
2006-07-26 05:52:25 · answer #6 · answered by kissfromaroes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋