How does this make sense, since America supports the Attack, yet wants peace for the Lebanese but would not let Israel stop its advances?
And if Hezbollah stops would this end the war in that region.
And do you think America plays fair when it comes to Israel and the rest of the Middle East?
2006-07-25 22:00:10 · 9 answers · asked by Point Blank 2 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
We all know that the Americans are pro with playing games,Am happy the whole world is watching this one,
Its a tight one for them ,its geting hoter,by the day .
Lets see what sied they wil rest at the end of the day.
This time thev betting a little too much.
2006-07-26 02:51:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What does this mean "plays fair"?
I suspect ,and would expect, that they try and achieve their own objectives from their foreign policy. As does everyone else. Nothing to do with playing fair.
I'm sure America does want peace for the Lebanese, and in fact peace and quiet from the whole region, however that does not extend to Hezbollah, Syrians, Iranians and all others who support International Terror
2006-07-25 22:07:48 · answer #2 · answered by diab963 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"And if Hezbollah stops would this end the war in that region."
Don't you remember, how the war got started???
Hezbollah has been rocketing Israel for years... now they start something with attacking and taking Israeli troops prisoner (if they are still alive???)
anyway if Hezbollah would stop I am sure Israel would stop... and as far as USA selling to Israel missile technology, Iran is giving Hezbollah weapons and missiles...
2006-07-25 22:44:53 · answer #3 · answered by uncle.bubba 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In this case, I definitely don't think America plays fair. Backing Israel & ,at the same time, supplying aid to Lebanon is self-contradictory.
2006-07-25 22:06:55 · answer #4 · answered by whatever 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think America and the UK are just very greedy and only get involved if it benefits them. They wont tell Israel to stop because they want them on side to fight terrorism and the rest of the middle east, America also is very keen to get its hands on all the oil
2006-07-25 22:07:58 · answer #5 · answered by Emmie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they desire to hedge their bets, so the suited winner would be their buddy no count what. If u . s . a . of america does not do it then who will? The arms sellers get wealthy and the communities assisting devastated factors do their artwork, all people wins as long as this is American. in my view i don't be responsive to the place all this nutrition and stuff comes from extraordinarily whilst there are malnurished babies suitable interior u . s . a . of america.
2016-10-08 08:14:25 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a mrriage made in heaven, you supply the one with arms to blow up the other, and then become the good guy by supplying aid to the victims
2006-07-25 22:11:35 · answer #7 · answered by themanwithnoname 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money money money.
They were selling aviation fuel to us and the Germans and the Japanese during ww2 so nothing's changed.
2006-07-25 22:05:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they should either leave them alone or treat each side equally.
2006-07-25 22:10:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋