You might have heard of the Darfur conflict in the western corner of the Sudan in Africa. Good news is that one of the rebel factions, headed by a Mr. Minnawi, signed a peace agreement with the Khartoum government. But the irony is that this particular rebel leader met and discussed "some peace issues" with the World's Number 1 Republican, Mr George W. Bush. The question is: Of all rebel leaders the world has ever known, why has Mr. Bush willingly wanted to meet this particular African rebel leader? Is he ready to meet Kony of the Lord's Resistance Army too? Or it is rather about the oil reserves in the Darfur desert? How serious are American politics?
2006-07-25 19:25:34 · 5 answers · asked by beaugarcon 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually, according to Bob Geldolf Bush is sincerely interested in African issues.
2006-07-25 19:28:23 · answer #1 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one knows much about Joseph Kony. He says he wants peace, but hes crazy, he says god tells him to kidnap children and force them to kill. I dont like Bush, but I know that if they ever spoke with each other, there would be much tention as Kony has insulted Christianity.
2006-07-25 19:32:05 · answer #2 · answered by Vahan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it is the leader who he (Bush and his staff) believe should take the country into the next stage of peace.
2006-07-25 20:13:17 · answer #3 · answered by brogdenuk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its all about the oil as the rebels hit the lines and oil goes up. by working with nigeria, they can stop it to bring oil down.
2006-07-25 19:28:36 · answer #4 · answered by hollywood71@verizon.net 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your assumptions that President Bush regards Israel as a terrorist state is an exaggeration ... neither is Israel enticing in any type of genocide. in case you may study any area of Israel military comments with regard to the numbers of civilian and terrorist useless after an operation, you'll locate that the terrorists useless are mingled with voters. curiously this solves 2 issues for the terrorists: (a million) Terrorists construct their scuffling with compounds in and round civilian enclaves for purely political motives, i.e. even as the terrorists are attacked (by Israel or US) a range of of civilians are killed alongside with infantrymen. that's used at present, to charm to global interest to the deaths of civilians and faraway from the deaths of terrorists who were intermingled with the civilians...all which the UN community makes use of to cry "foul" on Israel. that is fairly an uncomplicated workout on behalf of the palestinians, hezbollah and all relative communities of their eternal struggles against the state of Israel and the U.S. Terrorists use their media for this sole purpose each and every of the time now. reading many newspapers, journals and periodicals I see this uncomplicated party getting used over and yet back by all terrorists agencies. that is a standard experience to degree. that's the reason i'm amused by terrorist newspapers and tv networks who, daily, arise with the similar old, contrived prices against Israel and the U. S.. for sure, i trust its also ordinary to understand (pretty in case you view photos and expertise reels of a few of the scuffling with) that terrorists employ their own different halves, adolescent little children to stay close to them in the course of the scuffling with. that's the reason "households" are reported being killed after Israel and US bombing missions are finished against strongholds. in fact, that's one reason that US infantrymen are being charged with "crimes" even as terrorists are killed alongside with their family individuals and/or different civilians they cover in the back of throughout skirmishes. I stay in wish for our destiny.
2016-10-15 05:27:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋