ok, humans have not completly figured out how our brain works. why would we benfit off of a robot that can think like we can. you can't survive in this world without a job, they want to put these robots in the place of humans to do dagerous jobs. ummm, hello, some people love dangerous jobs. why are they doing this. i am going to be a navy seal, you think a robot will take that job too. how about doctors, scientists. so again, why?
2006-07-25
17:29:03
·
7 answers
·
asked by
almostageniusbutsomuchtoknow
2
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Other - Science
As far as what is it? There are two kinds, weak and strong. Weak AI is the expert system that has already been described in a previous answer adequately. This type of AI has been around for many years. (Ford has had a very limited form in its car computers since the '80's.)
Strong AI has not been implemented, yet. It is a general intelligence that can adapt to changing environments and handle different problems. Basically it will be as flexible as the human mind, if not more so.
Theoretically, the ability to take in a greater amount of information in less time and to be able to act on that information in a fashion that is beyond the abilities of the human brain. (There are a bunch of fun little mathematical comparisons that can be made, but I will not bore you with such details.) Us humans are limited to our 5 senses and a data rate that is quite limited. Did you know that the average sensory nerve can only take in information at a rate of about 50 samples per second? Modern sensors can move much faster than that and can be in greater numbers in a multitude of locations.
There is, of course, the consideration of time on the job. A computer does not need rest. It can continue without rest, food, or restroom breaks for extended periods of time. For some applications, that can be very beneficial.
The benefits of a strong AI would be the ability to reason without bias. Human thinking is colored by emotions. Theoretically, an artificial mind would not have those colorings. People that fear that type of thinking, in my mind, have a hard time accepting reality if they do not like it.
Artificial intelligence will not put everyone out of a job, especially doctors. People still need contact with other people. AI may assist professionals, but it will never replace the professionals.
I commend you on your choice of profession. It takes a lot of work and a lot of training. A lot of that training will be with computers, for communication, logistics, etc. They will be tools at your disposal, not replacements.
2006-07-27 18:16:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by CoveEnt 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Artificial intelligence is the intelligence of an expert, which is incroporated in a computer memory. This incroporated intelligence can be utilised as and when required, in the absence of that expert. As in the case of doctors, the expertise of any specialist doctor (less in number) can be utilised in many different places and at different times simultaneously through computers. In case of scientist, the same thing could be applicable. Once the idea of a scientist is incorporated in the computer, it can be convervted into user friendly computer package. The user need not bother about the theoritical back ground and the user need not to understand the fuzzy formulae inside the package. For example, as an agricultural scientist, I developed some fertiliser adjustment equations for banana cultivation. I just converted them into the user friendly computer packages. The farmers need bother about the mathematical calculation involved in the package and even the farmers are not able to understand all these mathematics. But the farmers can utilise my expertise through this package even without consulting me. Thus, the artificial intelligence is very useful in any kind of profession.
Addition:
When risk factor is more in a particular job, there is nothing wrong in involvement of robot with artificial intelligence. If the human expert really wants to take part in the risky job, there is possibility of lose of valuable expertise to the human kind. The activity of artifical intelligence inculcated in the machine is faster than the same intelligence existing in the human expert. Eg. multiplication of two 10-digit numbers. A handy calculator can do within a fraction of second. The data feeding time will be more comparatively. The decision making by a robot is faster than that of the expert. The accuracy of the robot is more than that of the human expert. There will not be any dilemma in robot in critical situations but the human expert may have dilemma because of the voluntary involvement of other factors in his mind. Another added advantage of artificial intelligence is that the expertise of any resource person can be utilised simultaneously at different places separated by long distances. You please keep in mind that the production of live human expert in a particular aspect is costlier than that of similar robot with artifical intelligence imparted from the same human expert. The live human expert is worthier than the robot, in terms of value. The robot is equal to the human expert, in terms of quality.
Addition 2.
The doctors or scientists can not be replaced by the robots. If the findings or any strategies developed by a doctor or scientist is incorporated into the robot, that robot can be helpful for implementing the same strategy.
2006-07-25 18:41:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by K.J. Jeyabaskaran K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You sound very much like the people who lobbied aginst the motor car because it was going to put horses out of business (and man cannot physiologically survive moving faster than about 15mph anyway!).
2006-08-01 23:26:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think that computer controlled traffic signals are dangerous also. Can we trust them to prevent accidents? Think of all the cops we have put out of jobs who could be directing traffic at every intersection.
2006-07-25 17:35:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, get over yourself, and stop being so paranoid.
EOD (Explosive Ordinance Disposal) teams uses robots to help dispose of bombs.
By your way of thinking they should just let a person get killed then let a remote-controlled machine that's easily replaceable diffuse it.
2006-07-25 17:43:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
human beings have a present day referred to as determination. no rely how more desirable AI turns into, human beings will continuously have an intuition to tell them top from incorrect. Robots programming will tell them the main clever thank you to get to their purpose. place a ball in the back of a small fence. the purpose is to get to the ball. A robotic might circulate at once in the time of the fence till it gets to the ball. A human might seek for a gate, or perhaps jump over the fence, circulate around the fence, dig decrease than the fence, or in simple terms ask a guy or woman to hand them the ball. and that i admire your analogy to a gun, yet save this in ideas: a gun can fire without killing. regardless of if the gun grew to become into to circulate off, it would require ammo loaded interior the gun. weapons might take a seat for hundreds of years without somebody to tug the set off. you're able to as properly verify "Ripley's have faith it or not" yet a guy gathered over one hundred eighty weapons without ever firing one. as long as stable human beings stay, attempt to not lose desire.
2016-12-10 14:36:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kids at school use know all about 'artificial intelligence' - they call them computers and calculators!
2006-08-01 23:10:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋