English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WHY IF I wanted to destroy our country i would vote republican.
duh

2006-07-25 16:19:51 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

WERE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE ENVIROMENT. THE POINTLESS WAR. I LOVE MY COUNTRY. I WOULD FIGHT FOR IT. BUT THIS WAR IS SO POINTLESS IT IS CAUSING UNESESARY DEATH.

2006-07-25 16:35:22 · update #1

19 answers

Look at the answers to your question: Bush supporters can only answer with crude, insulting, unintelligent remarks because intimidation and machismo are the only tools available to them. Just like their compatriot Rush Limbaugh, they can only fight with their big mouths, refusing to shut up and carry on a half-way intelligent debate. Conservatives thinks liberals are evil because they're afraid of them; and cowards use manipulation and intimidation because it's all they know, just like Bush believes he can achieve world peace with guns and ammo.

2006-07-25 16:28:40 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 0

you are able to guess that it extremely is because of the fact bush did no longer injury the regulations. He did have information (no be counted how incorrect it became) that Iraq did have weapons of mass destruction. the very incontrovertible fact that they by no capacity discovered any is beside the component. If we are advised by capacity of a secure practices branch of a foreign places government that a guy has basically left their airport on a airplane with a pantsful of explosives, will we touch the pilot and enable him understand or will we basically wait to make certain if the airplane explodes. Bush did what he felt he had to do. Water boarding became no longer deemed unlawful. different methods of intense interrogation have been used perpetually...and this became basically the component that opposition politicians concentrated on because of the fact it made him look undesirable. Bush DID HAVE criminal advice in the previous he ever allowed it. have confidence me, if the Obama administration might have arise with something ironclad against bush, they might stop will all the rhetoric blaming him for each little thing and easily grant the information to the yank human beings. Duh.

2016-12-14 14:01:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Hey, I'm a liberal. Those days you're pining for are over. I hate to say it. The Muslims have forced our hand. We must stop their attempt at Islamic world domination.

That's what this is all about. Thanks to the World Wide Web and the Internet people are awakening to the fact--there is no going back to the good old days. It doesn't matter who the President is now. Events have shadowed politics here in America.

We are in the fight to stop Islamic global domination. Israel's little defense tactic is just a precursor to the bigger show. Stopping Islam before it is too late.

So, get the corn poppin', chill the sodas and sit back and relax or cringe, but there is no going back. Our hand is being forced by the relentless nature of the Islamic government/religion's attempt to make us all Muslim.

2006-07-25 16:45:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

People think that "liberals" are evil because they are dumb beyond comprehension, and their spelling and grammar are detestable. It's not that liberals are dumb because they can't read and remember data, which are the most elementary of cognitive functioning. It's because they can't reason (a much higher cognitive functioning) with the data they remember, and they have to lie like hell in order to develop any kind of verbage that might show a hint of logic or reasoning. So, lying being such an integral part of evil, and lying being such an integral part of being a liberal, people can logically conclude that liberals are evil. God Bless you.

2006-07-25 16:27:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

Well the most vocal supporters of the Bush administration are the Religious Right. Their take on life is that because they believe in Jesus they are sinless. Understand what this means those Religious fanatics are NEVER wrong. They are not responsible for any harm they ever do to anyone. They believe in Jesus and all the crimes they commit are "covered in the blood." But the rest od us are sinners who deserve to be punished and or murdered for our not accepting their version of their religion. That is what you are dealing with. It is pure delinquency, and it is pure irresponsibility. I will repeat this, they do not have to be held accountable or responsible for the harm they do to others. To them we are all evil. They set off World War III, it is all for Jesus, and they are not accountable.

2006-07-25 16:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They are pro child molesters and baby killers. What part of evil do you not understand? Not supporting the war on terror is evil. It's like saying that bombing and killing innocent people without warning is OK.

2006-07-25 16:28:38 · answer #6 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0 0

"First, liberalism holds that there is no way to authenticate and prove as true any one version of the Christian faith...Second, liberalism rejects the Bible as being the actual Word of God to man...Third, liberalism restates the doctrine of Christ to show his utter humanity...Fourth, liberalism denies that the Bible has any inherent moral authority over men...Fifth, liberalism denies that mankind is lost and under the condemnation of sin...Sixth, liberalism has no concern with the New Testament concept of the church."

This quote is an excellent description of liberalism among brethren. It is sad that Shelly accurately described liberalism and eventually became a classic liberal himself. He has since repudiated his good work with several books.

Let's look at some other characteristics of liberals among us. While all of these characteristics may not be present in all liberals, they are representative.


Liberals downplay the necessity of a "thus saith the Lord" for what they do. Scripture is either ignored, excused as being culture or gender biased, or looked upon as being subjective.


Liberals tend to have an ends justify the means attitude. This attitude is evident in the matter of the work and worship of the church. Lavish entertainment schemes are devised to "draw them in so we can teach them later."


Liberals tend to downplay the necessity of baptism for the remission of sins. Some will try to expand their definition of a Christian to anyone who has been immersed. Some of the even more radical among the liberals who claim that even those who have been sprinkled are Christians.


Liberals want to fellowship those who are not in fellowship with God. Men are invited to liberal gatherings who are either denominational preachers or openly fellowship denominations.


Liberals tolerate almost everything, with the exception of faithful brethren who question their false views. They exercise an irenic spirit toward those in denominations, while reacting with hatred toward conservative brethren. They often get made when asked to justify their unscriptural actions. Those who object are called "right wingers,Ñ "traditionalists," "radicals," "hide bound," and "moss backed," among other things.


Liberals do not believe in the distinctiveness of the church. They are constantly talking about "the yellow pages church of Christ" and talk about "our fellowship" and "our heritage." They seek to expand the church to include many who have never even obeyed the gospel.


Liberals laugh about the "restoration plea" They believe that it is impossible to restore New Testament Christianity. They have said, "What church should we restore? Corinth? Ephesus? Laodicea?" They talk about the restoration period as the beginning point for the church of Christ.


Liberals deny that there is a pattern for the church. To them it doesn't matter how we worship, or how one becomes a Christian, or how the church functions. Many of them will declare that "everything we do in life is worship." With this casting off of the pattern our present day liberals are inching toward the open use of instrumental music in the worship.


Liberals always talk about grace and deny the obedience is necessary for salvation. Instead of holding a biblical view that balance both grace and obedience, they, as a whole, deny the necessity of obedience. Some have even begun to teach "grace only" and "faith only."


These are just a few of the characteristic of the liberals among us. While we could easily give a refutation to each of these areas we need only go to a couple of Scriptures to give us the answer. "Thus says the LORD: "Stand in the ways and see, And ask for the old paths, where the good way is, And walk in it; Then you will find rest for your souls. But they said, 'We will not walk in it'" (Jeremiah 6:16). ""You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you" (Deuteronomy 4:2).

2006-07-25 16:43:01 · answer #7 · answered by Tank Stillton 2 · 0 0

Because its not the republicans only that are destroying the USA, its all the politicians acroos the board......they are all crooks and criminals.....instead of bickering with themselves they should worry about cutting down there salaries and giving the money to the people....they dont need such outragious salaries to sit there and decide our fate......

2006-07-25 16:23:05 · answer #8 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 0 0

because people don't know the difference between Osama and Saddam... and al-Queda and Iraq... it's PAINFULLY apparent by those that have answered here...

in other words... they don't know what's going on and are afraid to trust anyone but the government...

and you got to love Randy D's "god bless you" after lying and defaming an entire group of people with no citation or actually reason based on fact what so ever... classic...

2006-07-25 17:25:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because change scares conservatives and liberals are all about positive change. Since the world is always changing, and since this country has been getting more and more liberal since its inception, all they can do is call us evil and hope it sticks.

2006-07-25 16:24:14 · answer #10 · answered by canejacket 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers