The most violent game I've ever played was SOLDIER OF FORTUNE on the computer. SOF was released in 1998. The game's format was that of a typical First Person Shooter, where you see yourself holding a gun and must go find and kill enemies. It was an FPS unlike most current FPS games like HALO and Counter Strike.
Where SOF differed from the rest of the genre was in its depiction of violence.
Every one of the enemies you would come across was designed with gore zones. Basically gore zones were 3d polygonal renderings designed to come apart so that they allowed the enemy to behave realisticaly depending upon how he was injured.
For example, shooting someone in the head with a small caliber handgun, put a hole in their face.
Shooting someone in the foot with a small caliber handgun put a bloody hole in their foot, and caused them to hop up and down screaming in pain.
However, shooting someone with a large caliber weapon in the head, took their head off entirely. Shooting them in the stomach caused their intestines to explode out of their bodies.
Shooting them in areas of the body such as the arms, legs of hands AMPUTATED that body part.
So much effort went into making the enemies realistic that they were given flesh tones like real people and even given voice acting of real actors so that they spoke in their native language.
This was easily the most violent, gory experience I ever had playing a video game. The things you saw went far beyond the good ole' days of Mortal Kombat fatalities in which someone would simply rip a guy's head off. SOF actually looked like real life.
I loved Soldier of Fortune and I look forward to all of its sequels. However, I believe that as an adult, I understand violence and simply playing the game is not going to cause me to go out and behave with homicidal violence. Children however DO NOT understand violence. They do not understand the consequences of violence...they do not understand the consequences of the death and murder they see in Television, movies and games.
In the innocent world of a Child, people die but, their is no lasting consequence and everyone else lives happily ever after.
It is for this reason that I believe there should be censorship in games sold to children but NOT in games to adults who specifically purchase MATURE rated games knowing what they intend on paying for.
I honestly believed that the ratings system imposed by the ESRB would improve the video game world but, instead, it has put even more stigmatism on games and gamers, and even worse - it has caused developers to focus on bringing even MORE blood and gore to the table without focusing on the actual quality of the games.
Grand Theft Auto San Andreas is in my opinion the most notorious game due to its WIDESPREAD purchase and the hot coffee scandal in which we can see graphic sexuality which includes "dry humping" and "simulated fellatio" as well as "Nudity".
To be perfectly honest, as an Adult, I would have purchased GTA:SA whter it had the sex or not - I bought it for XBOX before the Hot Coffee Scandal. Having excessive violence ans sex in a game only emboldens players to spend more to get these games.
Why ?
Because SEX, VIOLENCE and DRUGS are reality.
Why is it that politicians see it neccessary to sugarcoat reality?
Basically, these neo-conservative Republicans are the ones behind it. Regardless the fact America is suppossed to be a seperation of Church and State, the neo cons continuously lobby to enforece strict Christian values on ALL AMERICANS.
This is nothing more than a religious zealotry - a Christian Oligarchy. I
It is UNFAIR.
It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
IT IS UN AMERICAN !
2006-07-25 15:44:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There shouldn't be censorship in video games for the same reason there shouldn't be censorship in movies. They've all got ratings on them. If people would just read the boxes of what they're buying/renting, it's very clear whether something is age-appropriate or not.
A 12 year-old shouldn't be playing a game like Leisure Suit Larry, censored or otherwise, just like they shouldn't watch something akin to PlayboyTV, censored or otherwise. The concepts displayed in those mediums are NOT age-appropriate for a 12 year-old, regardless of whether they put in a censor bar or bleep out a swear word.
Censorship isn't the answer, parental guidance is.
2006-07-25 15:46:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Oh no 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is censorship in video games unless you are playing those rated above mature in which is equal to NC-17 movies.
2006-07-25 15:44:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Leesfer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
video games can glorify habit it is not any longer solid. video games alongside with Grand robbery automobile- the position the total factor of the game is to pull human beings out of their automobiles, beat them up and then metallic their automobile, then they could crash college busses and poilce automobiles- those sorts of video games purely glorify atrocias criminal habit. all of us do not forget that in spite of the score, children and youthful ones play those video games. They prepare each and every thing from drug and alcoho use, to violence in the route of ladies human beings, to criminal habit- the toddlers taking area in the game appreciate doing this stuff (contained in the game) and there is not any consequense for those issues they do. those can desensitize toddlers and they could commence to settle for those behaviors as regularly occurring. i understand there is continuously the mum and father responsibility attitude. mom and father might want to tell their toddlers that that is unacceptable- " ok youngster, i will purchase you this pastime the position they blantently damage the regulation, yet continuously remeber that throughout spite of the very undeniable actuality that that is relaxing contained in the game, it incorrect in genuine existence." that makes as a lot experience as having the smoking is undesirable communicate which includes your youngster, if you're somking. Or how about this agument- If mom and father do not approve, they ought to no longer purchase it for his or her toddlers- mom and father haven't any administration over the video games their toddlers play at persons's residences. We were all toddlers, all of us understand what we did even as somebody else's abode guidelines were diverse than ours. i wish those will be some large arguments to help. the final analysis is that i imagine mom and father favor to take extra responsibilty in this difficulty. I also imagine that the organizations who make those video games favor to imagine of the influence they have on society. i trust that Censorship has its position in those video games- yet purely even as the habit protrayed is blatently unlawful. those video games at the prompt are very lifelike- the days of a frog dodging automobiles to get to the river- are lengthy lengthy gone. For the most area i imagine the proper censorship ever isn't giving funds to the persons who produce those evil video games.
2016-10-15 05:18:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by jesteriii 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there was censorship in video games, society wouldn't be able to blame violence on them.
2006-07-25 15:46:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nymph 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because video games are virtual not real, so it dosent matter what game developers put in the game.
2006-07-25 15:49:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rock 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well they compare to movie ended movie has more violence than game, but the thing is video game player is alot younger than movie goer, example how many under 17 play GTA 3? alot i said.
2006-07-25 15:47:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Censorship is EASY!!! If you don't like it... don't watch it, listen to it, play it, or do it. If I want to, it's none of your business.
2006-07-25 15:48:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sean T 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just rate them. Let people decide. The govt should not be in the business of babysitting us.
2006-07-25 15:46:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lupin IV 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be unconstitutional. We live in a free country (well, we did before 2000).
2006-07-25 15:44:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋