Is there anything wrong with this statement?

Question

The concept of "war crimes" was introduced to world law just before Israel became a state (again). Israel captured hundreds of Palestinians for unlimited detention. A militant organization captured two Israeli soldiers for use as a bargaining chip to obtain the release of Palestinians. Israel responded by murdering dozens of Palestinian civilians -- a war crime.
.
The biggest problem with using 9-11 as an analogy is that we are not attacking any terrorists who had anything to do with 9-11. Those people are sitting in the White House. We now have evidence that the twin towers were brought down by pre-planted explosive charges, coordinated with the airplane attack. A mixture of Thermite and sulfur was used to cut the columns, causing the collapse. This was clearly not the work of a handful of Arabs armed with box-cutters. A rogue network, including individuals in key spots in the administrative and legislative branches of our country, shot us in the foot to "justify" invading Afghanist

Answer 1

so basically thousands of people and firefighters died in a building that was rigged with explosives yet no one knew it was rigged not even the firefighters or police who would have had to be notified prior to anyone starting to set up the explosives,

and the whole time they were running lines across the whole building like they have to for bringing down a controlled building explosion...none of those wires were seen

somehow the ones who did this were able to run the wire without anyone seeing it. and somehow with a building with thousands of windows no one captures the explosion light blast as they systematically fired off in a pattern which would cause the controlled fall.

and somehow no one heard the thousands of synchronized blast which would be heard for miles prior to the building beginning to fall.

and what you are saying is the one they call the dumb president, and the man with the bad heart, along with the other staff at the white-house are experts in explosive demolitions and when they were not at press briefings or doing anything else they were able to go into the twin towers a few states away and set up the explosives without the press ever seeing one of them...then they were able to convince some people to fly the planes into the buildings and the pentagon and a field.

are you somehow trying to convince us that the one they call the dumb president was able to pull off one of the most devious spectacular genius plan without ever having a single person within this elaborate conspiracy somehow go running to the press with the secret plan to have this done....

Oh my God George Bush is a genius and he has hundreds maybe even thousands of totally loyal subject who will die for him.

if he is such a genius mastermind then all those who think he is dumb are clueless airheads who have been duped by someone who clearly would be much more brilliant than them.

well lets look into this war crime thing a little closer than you maybe onto something here...

lets see the united nations brokered a deal with Israel that said if they withdrew from the Gaza strip and Lebanon, that the Lebanese would disarm Hezbollah and Israel would have peace for land deal

...so Israel after withdrawing...from both places. has committed a war crime by keeping up their part of the UN peace agreement...

So by your logic the one who goes along with the UN accord is committing a War crime...makes sense using your logic for 9/11

I got to agree with you here It is all George Bushes fault and Israel...you know I bet it was George Bush who kidnapped those two soldiers too
-------------
By the way:
I got some ocean front property in Arizona. if you are buying this...

Answer 2

I wish I knew. You left out some periods. I am noit sure if it is true.

The concept of "war crimes" was introduced to world law just before Israel became a state (again). Israel captured hundreds of Palestinians for unlimited detention. A militant organization captured two Israeli soldiers for use as a bargaining chip to obtain the release of Palestinians. Israel responded by murdering dozens of Palestinian civilians -- a war crime.

The biggest problem with using 9/11 as an analogy is that we are not attacking any terrorists who had anything to do with 9/11. Those people are sitting in the White House. We now have evidence that the twin towers were brought down by pre-planted explosive charges, coordinated with the airplane attack. A mixture of Thermite and sulfur was used to cut the columns, causing the collapse. This was clearly not the work of a handful of Arabs armed with box-cutters. A rogue network, including individuals in key spots in the administrative and legislative branches of our country, shot us in the foot to "justify" invading Afghanistan.

Answer 3

"We now have evidence that the twin towers were brought down by pre-planted explosive charges, coordinated with the airplane attack. A mixture of Thermite and sulfur was used to cut the columns, causing the collapse."

You forgot to mention that it was a missile that hit the Pentagon. There's even more evidence for that. Better be careful though ... the men in the black suits will be coming for you if you don't watch what you say, or even think (that technology probably isn't too far off).

Answer 4

War crimes have never stopped being investigated and the criminals sought after since the days of Hitler. It is not a new or reborn concept.

You are erroneous about the explosives being planted in the towers.

That is like saying the Holocaust didn't exist.

Answer 5

wow your deep into conspiracy theories!!! i never heard of such things, a bomb in the towers!? i ask you this, if a bomb was planted b4 the planes hit, why didnt they say that about the pentagon? what about the white house, that was a target that never got hit? why would they use planes to knock down the towers if they already had bombs planted?

what would we be saying now if the president didnt do anything in retaleation to the towers or pentagon? he was in a corner and had to make a descion. i support his descion b/c he was elected as the best man for the job although i did not vote for bush.

i could go on and on for hours about this, but i'm not going to b/c i'm sick of explaining it all to everyone who asks! do some more research on the matter b4 you start making theories that have no merit!

Answer 6

Are you soliciting for a grammatical critique or a authentic one? easily quite some issues come to pass without dealing with my options, in fact the universe existed for billions of years beforehand everybody seen it (except for sure you're a theist and count number God because the common philosopher). once you're searching for a grammatical critique the be conscious "its" is a possessive style, the contraction of, "that is" is "it is" The be conscious shall we must have an apostrophe between the t and the s. enable's is short for enable us. ultimately, you won't be able to commence a sentence with a conjunction, eliminate the completed stop from options and replace the capital S with a small s. there ought to correctly be different grammatical issues. English wasn't my maximum effective challenge.

Answer 7

Evidence of pre-planted explosives? Where?

http://www.911debate.com

Answer 8

Whats wrong with this statement...Kill the sum bitches that can't live in peace.

PS you have no evidence jack
PSS you forgot to say something about the Jews
PSSS you really ought to listen to yourself

Answer 9

As you can tell by most of the other answers, people would just rather stay ignorant than doing any research or thinking of their own. that is what those people in D.C. knew.

Answer 10

War crimes is against humanity and it must be stopped.