Do you think Michael Jackson really raped those little boys?

Answer 1

I think MJ acted inappropriately with those boys, but to what extent I am not sure.

To ANNA - don't believe everything you're taught. Not ALL people who were abused go on to be abusers!

Answer 2

I'll say no.

He's a whacko, and has problems, but if that's the best case the prosecutor could find? Nahh!

Look - anyone who was even fondled by him would realize by then it was meal-ticket time, but there's only 2 in 15 years who claimed that he did. Celebs like Culkin who have nothing to lose, insist he's just a kid at heart, nothing more. The first accuser was in the middle of a custody dispute, and the father got custody, and saw an opportunity to paint the mother as negligent for letting the kid visit Neverland, and also - Jackson paid him $20M to be quiet.... package deal.

This time - the mother's an accused (convicted? Soon?) welfare cheat, and shoplifter, who got money also when she claimed a store secuirty guard molested her; she exploited her "sick" child to get money from various celebrities, and thought she had hit the jackpot with Whacko Jacko.

They were living the high life; when the British documentary came out, she wanted moneyfor her son's fame (notoriety?). When nobody would shell out, the prosecutor started asking pointed questions and she concocted (very badly!) a story that didn't hold up.

If MJ is a cynical manipulative predatory and smart child molestor, why would he wait until AFTER the TV documentary to molest the kid, once the world was watching? Why would he let the other boy see him doing it? Why would he keep on doing thngs after the other boy set off the downstairs door alarm, the stairway motion alarm? Why would he do anything with the bedroom door unlocked, let alone wide open? Why would he even appear with the kid on TV and talk about sleepovers and beds in the first place?

If he's just a kid who never grew up, but with adult urges he can't control, why is this flimsy case the best the prosecutor could do in 16 years?

I think he's a kid who never grew up, who's never had to live in the real world and thinks everyone adores him. He's lived a fantasy life in his own Neverland for 20 years. He hasn't had anyone to tell him "stop" or slap his wrists. He's never had to face the fact, until now, that money doesn't grow on trees. According to trial testimony, he can be childish and petulant and impulsive(?? Really!?) at times.

He doesn't understand that some people will attach like leeches to free spenders who will give them a piece of the pie, and he doesn't understand that others can be cold and conniving.

And now he's broke and a pathetic man and will soon have to live in the real world. The only real winner is the first boy, whose dad stole him $20M free and clear. I wonder how much of that the dad got to spend?

Answer 3

Definitely! And as for the response of Monie above me, Please stop doing drugs. Just because the lady wanted to get a money settlement and was a greedy pig did not mean that Jackson wasn't a predator. His moving to Arabland so he can play "hey diddle diddle on a little boy's fiddle only adds to the sad truth.

Answer 4

Monie's answer was great! (except the not liking him part)
Anon I agree with you except for the last paragraph!

Michael is a little odd (most geniuses are) and that's why he falls pray to all the gold diggers! The media also helps those gold diggers by trying to find anything they can turn into something bad!

♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥

Answer 5

I honestly dont like the man, but I have to say no... i think he has issues within himself that he could deal with to help him grow up, but as far as abusing those children? i really dont think he did it... These parents saw a meal ticket and punched it!! And of course once one got away with it others are bound to try!! So to end it from happening again Michael had to stand up for himself.. cost him plenty including his reputation but what else could he do?

Answer 6

Please.

This freak ran away to a muslim country where it is specifically allowed for men to rape little boys. That pretty much says it all.

Answer 7

You see he went to the place where that stuff is accepted :)
So you tell me --If not rape - fondle -- There are many stars his age and they don't have 8-12 yr old friends ---????-

Answer 8

Yes, of course he did. He was abused in the same way by his father. I learned in psychology class that it is a vicious cycle. If, one person is abused they abuse someone else back.

It is horrible, awful, and tragic.

Answer 9

Naw...btw, did you know that the Pope's not really Catholic? Also, OJ's really innocent.

Answer 10

He surely molested them all