cuz they are dummies.
2006-07-25 15:41:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by American Superman 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
First off Hitler, was very racist and encouraged ethnic cleansing amonst his people, bush did the opposite. Hitler was praised as an excellent public speaker, people seem to enjoy criticizing the way bush speaks. Hitler was able to take over the better part of Europe through military force with precise tactical decisions, really this would fall more to Donald Rumsfeld, but I just dont think they'd be able to put that together.
2006-07-25 20:57:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah I think a lot of the Liberal Democrats got an F - in History because the real Modern Hitler is not Bush but it is the Liberals own precious Saddam Hussein a man who is so precious to the Liberals.
Then again Criminals are precious to the Liberals anyways, it's no wonder Sex Offenders get off the hook in a lot of areas in this COuntry especially highly Liberal areas.
2006-07-25 20:59:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by MrCool1978 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler and Bush have much in common, did you fail common sense? Both were short. Both were not very smart. Both were hell bent on talking over the world by force. Many followed Hitler blindly to their death. The 2500 plus dead in Iraq and the 18,000 wounded in Iraq are blood on Bush's hands. Also the 300,000 civilians dead in Iraq are in fact liberated. What GODLY man would invade a country after they surrendered? Only a Neocon would think that it's just Democrats. Bush only has the support of about 40 percent of his own party now.
2006-07-25 20:55:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately most republicans must have failed history, because Hitler forced legislation through that looked a lot like the Patriot Act.
2006-07-25 20:52:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by uncle bob 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't blame you for your ignorance... I blame the previous generations for your lack of comperehension. The fact of the matter is that it is people like you that make other people hate America. I passed history all through out high school with flying colors by the way. Did you kow that Hitler was voted in to office after he got out of prison. The same ignorant people that voted for HItler... Are the decendants of those who voted for Bush
2006-07-25 20:57:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm lets see.....I know its hard to see any difference, but I'll try:
Both Megalomaniacs.
Both in power because of support from industrialists.
Both use hatred of perceived "enemies" to whip up support.
Oh wait, I've got it, Hitler was a failed artist who saw combat while in the military during WW1 and George is a failed oil man who avoided combat by using his family connections.
2006-07-25 20:59:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by neerdowel 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure about that.. .The last time I heard according to liberals, waiting in line at Starbucks is comparable to being gassed in a chamber.
It's the liberal way....everyone is taking away your rights because you have to hear the word God once in a while. Just a bunch of overreacting freaks. Except, you don't want to defend America and react and fight against your enemies that want you on a prayer rug facing Mecca. In that case, that would be so tyrannical.
MENTAL DISORDER=LIBERALS
2006-07-25 21:22:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush may not be the ideal president, but surely it would be wrong to compare him with Hitler. That is an honor he really does not deserve!
2006-07-25 21:12:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by defender 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler was actually revered by the German people but Bush is hated by his. That's about the only difference
2006-07-25 20:52:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ferret 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everybody remembers the difference, Hitler is dead, the other guys just a dead-head!
2006-07-25 20:53:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by namazanyc 4
·
0⤊
0⤋