Is the the government trying to inslave us and dominate the world,and if so, why arent we waking up to it?

Answer 1

The government is not trying to enslave us. If we were slaves, we wouldn't earn an income, and without an income couldn't pay taxes. Haven't you ever heard the saying that there are only two sure things in this world: Death and taxes. If that saying is true (and I'm confident it is) then the world doesn't have to worrry about being enslaved. You should be more concerned about the possibility of your being enslaved by your fears (rather than by your government). You sound like someone who is ripe to be sucked in by a terrorist group. My advice to you is to clear your head and plan to become someone your parents can be proud of rather than a nut case.

Answer 2

Not really inslave or dominate us. But they do try to hide the truths that could cause us to uproar or oppose what they are doing.

Each government acts on itself to be more powerful than the next, it is to ensure that we are not taken over, and that we are feared, and respected. If we are feared and respected by other countries, we are less likely to be attatcked, and our way of living is less likely to change.

So maybe in a way it's good for us.

But the government tries to use for money alot, they pay people off, to hide things, to encourage economic growth, like the FDA is constnatly getting away with alot of things, and legalities. that they are not supose too.
(the food and drug adminsitration)
there are cures and treatments for diseases they wont approve of, because they are free, or less expensive. they rather approve something people have to pay alot of money for.
They hate the terms "natural" and "organic"....

It's just a matter of ensuring a better lifestyle based on economic growth, and political power over the world.

Answer 3

It sounds to me like you're a tad paranoid. There have been governments in the past who have technically enslaved it's people. They were put in prison, killed, or tortured for saying anything even remotely damaging about their government. You should beglad that you live in a country where you can ask such a question outloud without fear.

Answer 4

it relies upon upon the way you define dominate. Hitler sought to apply violent ability to dominate and a single political equipment. the present US government decrease than Obama isn't as "dominating" as previous administrations which includes GW Bush and Truman or Eisenhower. the U. S. interior the early 50's & 60's might desire to be classed as an Federal Imperial usa simply by it quite is land growth policies such because of the fact the vietnam warfare which now could be classed greater as an occasion of "American Imperialism" simply by Americas sturdy desire to apply stress to enforce regimes that would desire to be unswerving to the U. S.. The Iraq warfare might desire to be classed as dominating, triggered by using Iraq changing their oil barrel sales into Euros extremely than the Pedro greenback. it quite is now shown that on the time in simple terms in the previous going to warfare the U. S. government & it quite is allies have been conscious Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction. it quite is now widely believed that because of the fact of Iraq changing its oil sales to Euros this triggered the warfare. it is likewise widely believed that the U. S. hostilities in the direction of Iran is simply by Iran changing it quite is oil sales into euros in 2007. the U. S. has become weaker interior the present financial climate and it quite is funds have been badly broken. america is sited to become much less dominating and much less helpful interior the subsequent 30 - 40 years as new superpowers imerge which includes India, China & the ecu.

Answer 5

Governmnet by defenition dominates the world. The only difference is how they come into power.

Answer 6

No, what makes you think that?
The US has had and anti-imperialist policy from it's conception, we have taken over and let go of many territories over the years.
btw it's ENslave.

Answer 7

DON`T BE A TART , BUT I DO BELEIVE THE UN AND EC WILL.BUT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION IF THEY TAKE YOUR RIGHTS TO CARRY A GUN,WHICH BY THE WAY IS IN THE CONST. AWAY THEN YES IT IS A PROBLEM.BECAUSE IF THEY TOOK THAT RIGHT AWAY THEN THE CRIMINALS WOULD HAVE MORE ACCES (WHICH THEY DO NOW) WOULD RUFF THINGS UP AND THE GOVERMENT WOULD STEAL YOUR RIGHTS WAY. I LIVE IN LOSERVILLE DETROIT MICHIGAN AREA ,BECAUSE CRIME IS STEADY IN THIS WHOLE AREA AND BURBS, I CANT DEFEND MYSELF FROM CRIMINALS WHO ATTACK ME, SO U TELL ME IS OUR RIGHTS DISTORTED? IF I SHOT A CRIMINAL ATTACKING ME THEY WOULD PUT ME IN JAIL FOR MURDER SO U TELL ME .

Answer 8

Sounds like you're answering your own question and then "shocked" that we don't agree. Well, I don't agree with your answer, and therefore I could not be shocked by something that I don't believe exists. God Bless you.

Answer 9

Tou ARE the government, you sap!!!

Answer 10

No, I think you're just overreacting.