For example, liberals, CA, hippies, swingers, anything goes free-for-all. Clinton, need I say more?! Liberal = no boundaries, limitations with everything incl. & esp. morals.
Conservatives, just that, conservative on most issues, esp. morals.
2006-07-25 10:45:03 · 3 answers · asked by COblonde 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, that's way to broad of a generalization. There are too many issues to be taken into account before you can tell someones political party.
For example, you may have a person who is an environmentalist and swinger, but against minimum wage hikes and pro-life. All four of those characteristics are different, but, one person could feel that way about those subjects. So you can not define this person into one party or the other.
2006-07-26 10:18:24 · answer #1 · answered by B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No definitely not, the same way there are liberals who are socialists, while the majority aren't, and there are conservatives who are fascist, but the majority aren't. It's wrong to generalize-about anything.
2006-07-25 11:08:02 · answer #2 · answered by RATM 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No there are good and bad people in both parties. Some are religious and others not and still others anti-religion.
2006-07-25 10:58:19 · answer #3 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋