It would be a slap in the face of George Washington, But he would not want any part of how business is currently being done anyhow!
2006-07-25 10:37:48 · 8 answers · asked by bulabate 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Great idea, we could name the slums Cheneytown.
2006-07-25 10:39:24 · answer #1 · answered by Jared H 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It would cause too many changes in street signs and maps of the region. Besides in 20 years Bush will be done in History as one of the most bumbling Presidents that the US has ever had and who will want to be reminded of that by living in a city with that name. Now Busch is another matter.
2006-07-25 17:43:28 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. PDQ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush will be back in the lone star state in a couple of years, and Washington is the father of our country. Bush doesn't have that reputation....Now Clinton on the other hand....
2006-07-25 17:41:57 · answer #3 · answered by lynda_is 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh you are so funny, I forgot to laugh. The conditions of Washington DC have nothing to do with whoever is living in the white house. Remember Marion Barry?......
2006-07-25 17:42:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You missed a couple of L's and an I and T in the name if you really want to name it after W. For those of you who are republican that would be **LL**IT City. Where nothing is illegal for the Republicans.
2006-07-25 17:45:21 · answer #5 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would be better to name a village in Texas, Bush City. I know that they are missing an moron.
2006-07-25 17:41:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And we could fill up Cheneytown with Condoleeza's.
2006-07-25 17:41:19 · answer #7 · answered by michaelmoss30054 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We will name your hometown Dummyville. I like this idea.
2006-07-25 17:40:58 · answer #8 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋