Because it's ALL true !!!!
2006-07-25 10:26:55 · 32 answers · asked by brianlefttoe 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
You can't sue over the truth even if it is embarrassing.
2006-07-25 10:30:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
We have this little constitutional right, which is the same as the right we have to be here and say what we want (yet strangely within regulation). Public figures, such as polititians, are not allowed to sue based on ridicule because they know their position will come with a certain amount of scrutiny and opposition.
I wouldn't say the movie is all true, even Michael Moore is able to edit to provide his own view on things. Try to always speculate even what you want to believe, nothing is 100% true.
2006-07-25 10:31:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Moore picking on bush is like throwing rocks at a battleship-you make some noise, but not a difference.
most of the movie was Moore narrating" i bet bush is thinking this, and that...." are you saying Michael Moore is right? you are telling me that a man narrating a video with guesses of the thoughts of those in the video can be right in any sense?
2006-07-25 10:31:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush didn't sue Michael Moore, because Michael Moore is a total idiot, that doesn't deserve any attention.
Of course Bush can be an idiot too, but that is a another matter.
2006-07-25 10:30:50 · answer #4 · answered by Jordi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Altough Michael Moore told absolute lies in many cases and completley misreresented Bush, it would have looked bad on Bushs part to go after him.
2006-07-25 10:29:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Michael Moore has enough money. Seriously, I love the guy but I don't buy his poor man routine.
2006-07-25 10:29:47 · answer #6 · answered by cancerman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush is a rat faced moron. The sooner he lays down and fades away the better.
Fahrenheit 9/11 is all true anyway.
2006-07-25 10:31:22 · answer #7 · answered by *333Half-Evil* 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First it wasn't slanderous, and I dobut that he watched the movie. Second it was biased (like all Michael Moore movies), it only showed one side. Entertaining though his movies are they leave out valuble pieces of information to sway viewers towards his own beliefs.
2006-07-25 10:34:30 · answer #8 · answered by shaun1986 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because Michael Moore is allowed to, its called freedom of speech
2006-07-25 10:28:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You answered your own question. Why bother asking if you don't really want an answer?
Do you mean "Fahrenheit 9/11"?... it was a bit hyped-up, however I am an anti-Bush supporter so I didn't really care.
2006-07-25 10:31:57 · answer #10 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whoa... that movie has more lies in it than Michael Moore has fat cells in his big ***. Entertainment is below him. It would give the movie creedence to give it attention.
2006-07-25 10:29:23 · answer #11 · answered by Jake 'N' Shakes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋