English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-25 10:24:25 · 6 answers · asked by april.may 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

6 answers

If a person' life was at stake. Also, if a person's convictions were so strong that they were willing to pay the consequences resulting from breaking the law.

2006-07-25 10:29:12 · answer #1 · answered by BigRichGuy 6 · 0 0

Protesting a cause they deeply believe in for one. In any case, no harm should be done to any other person or property and the person should be ready to take responsibility for their action. This is were most activists fail. They think its OK to harm or destroy as long as its for what they (not necessarily others) consider to be a good cause but they do not want to take responsibility for their actions.

2006-07-25 17:31:04 · answer #2 · answered by williegod 6 · 0 0

When one is morally required to do so. Also on the freeway when the speed limit is below 70 mph and there are no cops around.

2006-07-25 17:31:56 · answer #3 · answered by Adam J 6 · 0 0

Medical emergency or to save a human or animal's life.

2006-07-25 17:34:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

When you become a politician and find an opportunity to make a few dollars.

2006-07-25 17:40:37 · answer #5 · answered by Kookiemon 6 · 0 0

in order to save a life, imho.

2006-07-25 17:27:46 · answer #6 · answered by ponyboy 81 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers