I don't know how it would look but it would think it looks fat.
2006-07-25 10:01:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by JKL 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
It's a shame because I think it would make things much better (except for a few days of the month). Historically some of the best leaders have been women (Margerat Thatcher, Queen Elizabeth, Joan of Arc). Ironically the image that they would be much slower to war than a man (probably true) is also the reason why the Democrats can't win in the US. They are portrayed as weak and while it may be true that women are more genetically inclined to be weaker than man, they are also genetically inclined to have stronger moral character. But that's just my opinion.
2006-07-25 17:10:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jared H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seems to me that it is . . .(ruled mostly by women)
the male figureheads in power are parrot-like puppets, no?
weren't they all conceived, carried, delivered, - and then mostly raised, by women??? expected of and encouraged by women - to be leaders, warriors, fathers, providers, protectors, defenders, etc. . .
ALL humans arrive here by/thru women -
If the world is a 'bad' place, it must be the women who remake it into a 'good' place - - - it begins in the womb, regardless of gender.
2006-07-25 16:58:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL Jal!
There are women in power now. Is it only the women with "masculine" qualities that make it to power, or does being in power change women?
2006-07-25 17:05:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by KATYA 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't know but when the real Amazon land evolves i volunteer to be the first man captured for sexual exploitation!
2006-07-25 16:59:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by bulabate 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Imagine everything being run by your Mom...that's how it would be.
It might be highly restrictive, but it would be much cleaner, and there would be a return of doilies.
2006-07-25 17:00:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by silvercomet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the worst we'd have is that all the leaders would just talk about each other behind their backs :)
2006-07-25 16:57:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by L 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it would look ugly and it would look weierd and there wouldent be such thing as a boyfriend if there were no men
2006-07-25 16:57:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jony boy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on how many have PMS.
2006-07-25 16:59:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dog Mama 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As it does!
2006-07-25 16:56:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋