English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-25 09:07:08 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

He is definitely a step better then his US backed predecessor who took bribes from rich Europeans and Americans and allowed his own people to starve on the streets of Havana. I think US policy toward Cuba has been more detrimental to the Cuban people then Castro himself.

2006-07-25 16:23:16 · answer #1 · answered by martin b 4 · 4 6

Good and bad, he kicked out the Americans companies in the 50s which were plotting on running the business part of Cuba so he had to turn to Russia for help because they don`t have many resources and they screwed him to. So Cuba today is the result of not letting the huge multinational corporations inside to take over the business part of Cuba.

2006-07-25 09:21:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Compared to Cuba before the Revolution, the Cuban people are much better off now.

By the way, Castro never played professional baseball in the US.

2006-07-25 09:12:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Awful. He oppresses his own people and I dont' care what anyone else says about how he "treats them so well". He doesn't let them lea`ve the country and he is blinded by his anti-americansim so much that he keeps his own people in poverty. He endangered the lives of many americans and thinks he was almost assasinated by the US 6 times (you would think the CIA would've killed him the first if htey wanted to).

He has free health care but the quality is as good as a third world nation (obviously)

Death to Fidel Castro
Long live democracy!

mikeae:
http://www.snopes.com/sports/baseball/castro.asp

2006-07-25 09:11:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Both. The man is an enigma.


By the way Cuba is the "mayo clinic" of the Caribbean. The health care there is hardly third world.

2006-07-25 09:13:19 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0 0

While Castro has been bad for Cuba through an oppressive communist government; it is difficult to say if it would be better if he had failed to defeat Batista.

2006-07-25 09:19:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There seems to be more people trying to get from Cuba to the US than the other way. (and we have almost 30 time the number of people too.)

You can make up your own mind.

2006-07-25 11:31:20 · answer #7 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0 0

Bad , because cuba hasn't really progressed much in the last 46 years.

2006-07-25 09:11:37 · answer #8 · answered by mick987g 5 · 0 0

I don't know about that. I do know he has bad for the New York Yankees.

A piece of baseball trivia, he was a pitcher in the Yankees organization before he became a dictator.

2006-07-25 09:10:48 · answer #9 · answered by mikeae 6 · 0 0

fidel has been, and nevertheless is, the worst component that would desire to take place to Cuba. The worst dictatorship in its historic previous regrettably, who advised you became ? word: "i think of the coolest has outweighed the undesirable" Why non Cubans stick their noses into something they do no longer understand ?

2016-12-14 13:50:13 · answer #10 · answered by ohle 4 · 0 0

Why do you think people risk their lives to escape Cuba?

2006-07-25 09:14:27 · answer #11 · answered by Dave B 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers