English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All you hear is "Bush just inherited Clinton's mess."

Really? I seem to remember things being great under Clinton.

Funny how his policies didn't screw up the country from 1992-2000

I guess his mistakes just took 8 years to kick in.

By following the conservative logic, can't we accurately blame all the problems since 2004 on Bush?

After all, you guys seem to like to blame the former administration.

2006-07-25 09:04:40 · 16 answers · asked by kubrickian 2 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

I think Republicans love dumping their own Bush-produced **** on Bill Clinton... because they're jealous.

I don't think Republicans can have sex.

Really.

Can YOU imagine doing it with Karl Rove?

Ick ick ick ack blahhh!

2006-07-25 09:12:20 · answer #1 · answered by St. Hell 5 · 0 1

depends on what you are talking about. If both sides get rid of rhetoric, you will see the economy is great by most measures, unemployment is at record lows on and on. Even with a trillion $ taken out of the economy from 911 it is pretty spectacular.

Problems include run away spending by congress and the president going along with it. Before you just blast Bush as spending on the war, remember that the most costly thing he did was give drug access to medicare. That will cost well over a trillion dollars in a program that is already in trouble...he did it for democrat votes.

And of course there is terrorism and the war. The big thing there is Clinton arrested a terrorist as a common criminal and ignored the overall terrorist groups. The 1st world trade center bombing comes to mind, among quite a few others. War was coming regardless of who was in office.

2006-07-25 09:13:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well it was your hero Clinton that tried to pay off North Korea and that pulled out of Somalia instead of dong the job right. Oh and what about his feeble attempt to get back at terrorist by firing some missiles at them. What a hero. Have you noticed that Bush has provided more money for schools and other social programs than Clinton ever did?? Look at the facts instead of the dummycrat sound bits and learn something about reality. The NAFTA trade agreement really helped this country according to the dummycrats, it was their baby and look what happened. At least now the jobs are in the far east and we are getting the wetbacks because the jobs Clinton sent south cost too much when it came to paying off the corrupt Mexican government.

2006-07-25 09:10:25 · answer #3 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 0 0

Blaming the former Administration is a very childish approach to politics. That is something you do in grade school. When you take office in the most powerful country in the world you assume responsibility for you actions. We are not children so why do we treat each other like so. Let the President be a man and take responsibility for his faults like the rest of us. Do you mess something up at work and tell your boss the is was the persons fault that had the job before you. That might work once if you are lucky, but It wont work twice. GROW UP AMERICA

2006-07-25 09:12:51 · answer #4 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 0 0

Bill Clintons the sht and George Bush is just the as*. I seriously think his whole family is connected to this terrorist thing. Both attacks on the Twin Towers happend when a Bush was in office, hes trying to open up the ports to these guys. They both were trying to pick wars with people from that region in general. They're just complete fuc up's. He keeps trying to deal with the worlds problems but he still has cities in his own country that are fuced up from katrina and slowly recovering.

2006-07-25 09:12:25 · answer #5 · answered by puresplprix 4 · 0 0

I am curious, as this is your second question/ statement of the blanket generalization variety, if you have ever read anything that backs up your statements.
There were intelligence failures in BOTH administrations leading to our present situation. With 20/20 hindsight, both conservatives and liberals may assess blame that in the long run leads us no closer to smashing Al Queda, or keeping our country safe. Part of the problem is assessing blame and pointing fingers. Instead of this, how about trying to find a solution?

2006-07-25 09:11:08 · answer #6 · answered by LawDogg 1 · 0 0

Clinton had to resort to blowjobs to get attention instead of dealing with a gathering threat. North Korea fooled him like the jackass he was.

It's funny, the libs think jobs are leaving. Who signed NAFTA dumbasses?

Clinton fiscal policy lasted through Oct 2001 which created the recession. I bet you didn't know that, now did you, leftist? No, ignorance is king. And historically, employment lags the economy by 1-1 1/2 years. So, Clinton's recession cost jobs through 2002-3, and then he put us in the position to get attacked on 9/11. Economics major here.

Clinton's lie about blowjobs and his screw-ups cost plenty of lives.

2006-07-25 09:08:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree with you on so many levels. Clinton economically speaking was gret for the country. Bush comes in, starts war, and almost breaks the bank.

2006-07-25 09:08:04 · answer #8 · answered by Yisrael Chai 3 · 0 0

Republicans and conservatives have one great love in life, Hate. They are slaves to hate. They can't analyze anything, they eat up hate like pigs at a trough--anything Rush Limbaugh creates out of his drug induced delusions, they believe. So when Limbaugh tells them everything is Clinton's fault, they are eager to believe. They are what con men call "marks".

2006-07-25 09:11:01 · answer #9 · answered by jxt299 7 · 0 0

Clinton shared technology with China and had a temporary solution to the economy. Clinton was awful.

2006-07-25 09:09:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers