English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And that Bush was King?! Lol, nah, not necessarily him, but that we'd have a king instead of a president?

2006-07-25 09:00:15 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

11 answers

What do you mean, "If"..

2006-07-25 09:23:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Half the country every 4 yrs can not wait for a change in leadership. A permanent king would probably be lynched to get that change. We no longer have respect for authority. Children talk back & order their parents around, teenagers & college students are sure they are smarter than all authority figures -
parents, teachers, professors, even religious leaders. Newly employeed know what is wrong with their companies - you get my meaning. These people would never accept a king.

I have lived through several wars & would never give up democracy at any cost. I do not think I am the smartest but I
love democracy & will never be without it.

2006-07-25 09:08:59 · answer #2 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

The United States has fought for a very long time to become what it is today. I wouldn't do anything to change it.


America has never been an empire. We may be the only great power in history that had the chance, and refused-- preferring greatness to power and justice to glory.
-George W. Bush

2006-07-25 10:52:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Re: your very last edit~you fairly undesirable, the U. S. is a federal republic. in preserving with the question, convinced. the U. S. can develop right into a monarchy lower back, both by using repealing the announcement of independence, or by using conquest. the former might want to be more effective not easy by using structure of the structure however.

2016-11-25 23:29:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

that only appeal's to me if i could be king first so that all others would be judged by what i was able to do for America.
I have no direct descendant's to replace myself with so i am uniquely qualified to go first.
I have two dui's like chenney and have used drugs like bush .I am pro life and anti death peneaty.
WOULD SEEK to end the police State we live in and provide oppertunity that would keep people from needing to commit crimes in the first place .
THE constitution suits me fine and the bill of rights is great .
I would end property taxes and reduce intrest rates to 10% on revolving credit and 3% on home loans .
GOVERNMENT would no longer be in the business of defense .INSTEAD our new policy is nuke them.THIS is how it works i come out and say that a country or people from a country just attacked us and if 50% of americans call in and vote nuke them thats the plan launch and never look back .THIS would finaly put the fear of death in them so i feel we would only have to nuke one country and from then on smooth sailing .

2006-07-25 09:07:41 · answer #5 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0 0

A king doesn't have much power, so maybe he would be a better king than a president.

2006-07-25 09:04:49 · answer #6 · answered by obiwan 1 · 0 0

hail to berger king

2006-07-25 09:04:53 · answer #7 · answered by Wiseguy 3 · 0 0

it already is. and the round table has seats for all the big corporations. their task? save us from all of our money.

2006-07-25 09:02:17 · answer #8 · answered by johnny_zondo 6 · 0 0

END OF THE WORLD...BY THE WAY...WHATS THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAY?

2006-07-25 09:02:49 · answer #9 · answered by Marcos 4 · 0 0

I guess if I was king, it would be ok.... otherwise, hell no.

2006-07-25 09:02:36 · answer #10 · answered by X 2 · 0 0

Wow! I thought it was.

2006-07-25 09:03:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers